2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to evaluate forest structure restoration needs across Oregon and Washington, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…not found at the larger geographic scale). Coniferous forests in this region are dynamic, as fire suppression, timber harvest, insect outbreaks, and natural succession continuously change forest structure and composition across the landscape (e.g., Hessburg et al 2000, Haugo et al 2015. All 3 species depend on coniferous forest habitats, so determining local management alternatives or forest restoration techniques that benefit this habitat type may be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not found at the larger geographic scale). Coniferous forests in this region are dynamic, as fire suppression, timber harvest, insect outbreaks, and natural succession continuously change forest structure and composition across the landscape (e.g., Hessburg et al 2000, Haugo et al 2015. All 3 species depend on coniferous forest habitats, so determining local management alternatives or forest restoration techniques that benefit this habitat type may be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout western North America, effects of climate change on MSForests are compounded by prior timber harvests and fire exclusion, which, via regeneration and release of shade-tolerant conifers, significantly increased tree density and abundance of young relative to older tree cohorts (Fettig et al, 2007;Halofsky et al, 2011;Hessburg and Agee, 2003;Hessburg et al, 2005;Loudermilk et al, 2013Loudermilk et al, , 2014Perry et al, 2011;Raffa et al, 2008). This shift in age structure manifests at patch to regional landscape scales (Larson and Churchill, 2012;Perry et al, 2004Perry et al, , 2011Taylor, 2004;Brown and Wu, 2005;Hessburg et al, 2000aHessburg et al, , 2005Haugo et al, 2010Haugo et al, , 2015Naficy et al, 2010). For example, in eastern Oregon and Washington, a cover type transition from drought and fire-tolerant to intolerant species is accompanying the shift in age structure , Hessburg et al, 1999a, 1999b, 2000aMerschel et al, 2014;Perry et al, 2004;Stine et al, 2014).…”
Section: Recent Changes In Msforestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a clear trade-off existed between increased fire activity to restore fire resilient forests and the conservation of NSO habitat. For instance, U.S. Forest Service managers are increasingly focused on managing for historical disturbance regimes and ranges of variability (Haugo et al 2015). Although areas of dense multilayered forests were preserved under historical fire regimes because of their topographic positions and climate (Camp et al 1997), accelerated wildfire scenarios we simulated burned through these areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mechanical fuel treatment programs are expensive and are constrained by administrative, financial, and operational factors (North et al 2015). The scale of existing programs and associated investments would need to be increased by several orders of magnitude to treat the backlog of forests that have undergone densification and fuel buildup due to fire exclusion practices (Haugo et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%