2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to model delamination growth in fatigue using the Virtual Crack Closure Technique without re-meshing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, following, 20,16,14 a progressive nodal release strategy is used to represent intermediate delamination front positions between node pairs, illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Energy Release Rate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, following, 20,16,14 a progressive nodal release strategy is used to represent intermediate delamination front positions between node pairs, illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Energy Release Rate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the VCCT expressions proposed in 20 to the 2D case illustrated in Figure 1, the Mode I and Mode II ERR components for node i can be determined by…”
Section: Energy Release Rate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, recently, De Carvalho et al [101] have proposed a modelling approach to simulate delamination propagation in fatigue that combines VCCT with a progressive nodal release strategy. The progressive nodal release alleviates the artificial stress concentrations found when using the VCCT with instantaneous release to model 3D delamination without re-meshing.…”
Section: Virtual Crack Closure Technique (Vcct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One critical point of the fracture mechanics modelling methods presented in the literature is to determine the energy release rate (G) components, then a modified form of Paris law and G-N curves achieved by experimental measurements are employed for evaluating fatigue crack propagation and initiation, respectively. Two typical approaches to compute the G components are the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) [2][3][4] and the level set method [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%