1992
DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(92)88172-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to the solid-phase peptide synthesis of peptide alkyl-amides and esters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 7 Although several methods have been reported for C-terminal functionalization after solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is complete, 8 these approaches either result in epimerization when applied to C-terminal Cys peptides 9 or the applicability of the method to C-terminal Cys peptides is not addressed. 10 , 11 While activation of the C-terminal carboxylic acid can induce epimerization via oxazolone formation in most amino acids, 12 cysteine is also prone to epimerization via direct deprotonation during its attachment to the resin 13 and upon prolonged or repeated exposure to base ( i.e. , during peptide elongation via Fmoc SPPS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 Although several methods have been reported for C-terminal functionalization after solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is complete, 8 these approaches either result in epimerization when applied to C-terminal Cys peptides 9 or the applicability of the method to C-terminal Cys peptides is not addressed. 10 , 11 While activation of the C-terminal carboxylic acid can induce epimerization via oxazolone formation in most amino acids, 12 cysteine is also prone to epimerization via direct deprotonation during its attachment to the resin 13 and upon prolonged or repeated exposure to base ( i.e. , during peptide elongation via Fmoc SPPS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, C‐terminal thioesters and hydrazides are critical to the synthesis of larger peptide targets through native chemical ligation (NCL) and non‐cysteine NCL . Despite the demand for C‐terminally modified peptides, there remain significant limitations in the available strategies to access them by chemical synthesis . Variations at the C‐terminus traditionally require repetition of the solid‐phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) on a different linker for each desired C‐terminal moiety, or the use of a C‐terminal glycine .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Despite the demand for C-terminally modified peptides, there remain significant limitations in the available strategies to access them by chemical synthesis. 8, 9 Variations at the C-terminus traditionally require repetition of the solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) on a different linker for each desired C-terminal moiety 2a,2c, 10 or the use of a C-terminal glycine. 11 Solution-phase activation of protected C-terminal acids risks epimerization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several publications have described the solid phase synthesis of peptide-substituted amides using C-terminal attachment methodology. [6][7][8] However these methods are not generally applicable since they require either a specific resin for each different class of amides 6 or primary aliphatic amines 7,8 and aromatic amines 8 that are not deactivated for the nucleophilic cleavage of the resin. Therefore, we sought to develop an alternative to the C-terminal attachment strategy for solid phase synthesis of peptide-substituted amides and esters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%