2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach with score-level fusion for the classification of a speaker age and gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed accuracy for each class is depicted in Table 1. Table 2 shows the comparisons of our proposed voice recognition method with reported ones in [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The projected voice recognition method in this study has better than [21][22][23][24][25][26] with accuracy of about 100 %.…”
Section: Proposed Technique and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The detailed accuracy for each class is depicted in Table 1. Table 2 shows the comparisons of our proposed voice recognition method with reported ones in [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The projected voice recognition method in this study has better than [21][22][23][24][25][26] with accuracy of about 100 %.…”
Section: Proposed Technique and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…e results were obtained on using the aGender dataset for the gender category with a 81.7% success rate. Yücesoy and Nabiyev [4] proposed a system for identifying speakers using a fusion score of seven subsystems where the feature vectors are the MFCC, PLP, and prosodic on three different classifiers that are GMM, SVM, and GMM-SV-based SVM combined at the score level. e classification success rate on gender identification using the aGender database is 90.4%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They managed to achieve a 96.4% success rate. The authors in [3] combined the estimated voice acoustic level of five different methods into one score level. The results were obtained on using aGender dataset for gender category of 81.7% success rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%