A new bionic MAV’s flapping motion based on fruit fly hovering at low Reynolds number

Abstract

On the basis of the studies on the high unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms of the fruit fly hovering the aerodynamic advantages and disadvantages of the fruit fly flapping motion were analyzed. A new bionic flapping motion was proposed to weaken the disadvantages and maintain the advantages, it may be used in the designing and manufacturing of the micro air vehicles (MAV's). The translation of the new bionic flapping motion is the same as that of fruit fly flapping motion. However, the rotation of the new bionic flapping motion is different. It is not a pitching-up rotation as the fruit fly flapping motion, but a pitching-down rotation at the beginning and the end of a stroke. The numerical method of 3rd-order Roe scheme developed by Rogers was used to study these questions. The correctness of the numerical method and the computational program was justified by comparing the present CFD results of the fruit fly flapping motion in three modes, i.e., the advanced mode, the symmetrical mode and the delayed mode, with Dickinson's experimental results. They agreed with each other very well. Subsequently, the aerodynamic characteristics of the new bionic flapping motion in three modes were also numerically simulated, and were compared with those of the fruit fly flapping. The conclusions could be drawn that the high unsteady lift mechanism of the fruit fly hovering is also effectively utilized by this new bionic flapping. Compared with the fruit fly flapping, the unsteady drag of the new flapping decreases very much and the ratio of lift to drag increases greatly. And the great discrepancies among the mean lifts of three flapping The project supported by the modes of the fruit fly hovering are effectively smoothed in the new flapping. On the other hand, this new bionic flapping motion should be realized more easily. Finally, it must be pointed out that the above conclusions were just drawn for the hovering flapping motion. And the aerodynamic characteristics of the new bionic flapping motion in forward flight are going to be studied in the next step.

Lift and thrust generation by a butterfly-like flapping wing–body model: immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann simulations

“…In this study, we use the same parameters of Bai et al (2007), that is, ∆τ t = 0.1T and ∆τ r = 0.32T . The Reynolds number based on the mean chord length c m is Re = 2ΦF req Lc m /ν = 110.…”

“…In this study, we use the following mathematical formulations of ϕ and β which have been used in many numerical studies (e.g. Sun & Tang 2002;Gilmanov & Sotiropoulos 2005;Bai et al 2007):…”

On the Estimation of Time Dependent Lift of a European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) during Flapping Flight

“…One such example is the flapping flight mechanism in which the wings are not only moving forward relative to the air, but also flap up and down, bend, twist and sweep, resulting in a complicated unsteady-aerodynamic motion. Understanding the role of unsteady forces on flapping flight will help in designing more efficient micro-flying vehicles [ 1 ].…”

To tread or not to tread: comparison between water treading and conventional flapping wing kinematics

“…Investigation into this idea brings us to the third type of hover that is not observed in natural flight and has received considerably less attention. This kind of hovering is called the water-treading mode [35][36][37]. In the normal hover mode, the wings have a designated leading and trailing edge.…”