2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2437539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Car-Following Model considering Driving Characteristics and Preceding Vehicle’s Acceleration

Abstract: In the past decades, many improved car-following models based on the full velocity difference (FVD) model have been developed. But these models do not consider the acceleration of leading vehicle. Some of them consider individual anticipation behavior of drivers, but they either do not quantitatively determine the types of driving or artificially divide the driving types rather than deriving them from actual traffic data. In this paper, driver's driving styles are firstly categorized based on actual traffic da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ey incorporated individual preference on optimal speed and safe distance into the traditional full velocity difference (FVD) model as additional driver attributions. Another study based on FVD was implemented by Zhang et al [30], which considered the acceleration of the preceding vehicle and the ego driver's driving style. Both studies have divided driving styles into three categories (aggressive, neutral, and conservative) and extracted features of each category to establish the respective driver models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ey incorporated individual preference on optimal speed and safe distance into the traditional full velocity difference (FVD) model as additional driver attributions. Another study based on FVD was implemented by Zhang et al [30], which considered the acceleration of the preceding vehicle and the ego driver's driving style. Both studies have divided driving styles into three categories (aggressive, neutral, and conservative) and extracted features of each category to establish the respective driver models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese explanatory models' significant advantage is their computation efficiency, which enables them to be easily incorporated in traffic flow simulation, especially with a large scale of vehicles. Consequently, these models have been widely adopted in microscopic and macroscopic traffic simulation studies [29,30]. However, it should be noted that although the driving style parameters in some studies were calibrated from naturalistic driving data, these models' performance in mimicking human driving styles still lacks evaluation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The car-following process is important to simulate the traffic flow, analyze the formation mechanism of traffic congestion, and manage the alternative proposals [13]. The car-following process takes place when "a driver follows a lead vehicle and tries to maintain distance and relative speed within an acceptable range".…”
Section: Car-following Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual characteristics of drivers were not presented well. To avoid this problem, Tang et al [30] improved the full velocity difference model (FVDM) considering driver's behavior by grouping drivers into three categories and discussed driver's individual property; Zhang et al [31] improved FVDM by considering the acceleration of preceding vehicle and the division of driving types derived from real data. Results showed that the aggressive and regular behavior play a positive role in stabilization of traffic flow while the conservative driver plays a negative role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the radical degree for individual drivers was not taken into account and thus the driver's individual radical feature cannot be well performed. But except for [31], the parameters of these studies were not calibrated by empirical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%