2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new centrality measure based on the negative and positive effects of clustering coefficient for identifying influential spreaders in complex networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the performance of DCC, four experiments are conducted based on the four datasets. DC (Degree centrality), CC (Closeness centrality), BC (Betweenness centrality), EC (Eigencentrality), Ks (K-shell centrality), LC (Local centrality) and NP (the centrality proposed in [32]) are applied to the same datasets for comparison. In addition, SI model is adopted to simulate the spreading ability.…”
Section: B Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to assess the performance of DCC, four experiments are conducted based on the four datasets. DC (Degree centrality), CC (Closeness centrality), BC (Betweenness centrality), EC (Eigencentrality), Ks (K-shell centrality), LC (Local centrality) and NP (the centrality proposed in [32]) are applied to the same datasets for comparison. In addition, SI model is adopted to simulate the spreading ability.…”
Section: B Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a novel centrality (abbreviated as DCC) belonging to semi-local centrality measures is proposed to identify influential nodes in complex networks. As indicated in [32], local characteristics including degree and clustering coefficient play important roles in identifying influential nodes, but the method in [32] (denoted as NP) does not consider neighbor information comprehensively. In our method, we take degree and clustering coefficient into consideration as well as neighbor information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the methods can be categorized into four classifications [13]: (1) Neighborhood-based centrality, such as degree and H-index [14], whose essence is to measure the importance of nodes based on the number of 1-step neighbors or multi-step neighbors; (2) Path-based centrality, such as closeness [15] and Katz centrality [16], whose essence is to measure the importance of nodes based on the shortest path; (3) Iterative refinement centrality, such as Eigenvector [17] and LeaderRank [18], whose essence is to measure the importance of the nodes based on the importance of their neighbors; (4) Node-operation-based centrality, such as connectivity-sensitive method [19] and stability-based method [20], whose essence is to measure the importance of the nodes by observing the impact on topological structure when deleting or merging the nodes. Among these methods, there are some centrality methods specializing in identifying influential nodes such as a centrality based on the negative and positive effects of the clustering coefficient [21], and a new local and multidimensional ranking measure [22].But theses methods just consider a certain structure in general.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [34] identify the influential nodes by incorporating the degree and clustering-coefficient of neighbor nodes. Berahmand et al [35] incorporate the natural characteristics of complex networks to capture the spreader node. Wang et al [36] identify the influential spreader by considering the weight neighborhood nodes in complex networks.…”
Section: B Network Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%