2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new chalcone structure of (E)-1-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-(napthalen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one: Synthesis, structural characterizations, quantum chemical investigations and biological evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FT‐IR vibrations of C=O are located in the range of 1666–1651 cm −1 . In present study, DI‐MNTDO showed sharp absorption bands of C=Ovibrations in the domain of 1739–1657 cm −1 (DFT) and 1608 (Experimental).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The FT‐IR vibrations of C=O are located in the range of 1666–1651 cm −1 . In present study, DI‐MNTDO showed sharp absorption bands of C=Ovibrations in the domain of 1739–1657 cm −1 (DFT) and 1608 (Experimental).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Both compounds consisted of similar C-H contents, which led to similar wavenumber values. The C-H in-plane and C-H out-of-plane bending vibrations appeared at 1474-1167 cm −1 and 1023-715 cm −1 , respectively [33]. The C-H in-plane The sensitized cells were analyzed by a Keithley 2400 solar simulator in order to determine the output voltage and the current reading of the tested compounds, under irradiation of AM 1.5 simulated sunlight (CHF-XM-500 W) with an intensity of 100 ± 3 mW/cm 2 .…”
Section: C-h Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this description must be questioned on two grounds; firstly, the HÁ Á ÁBr distance in question, 2.93 Å , is not significantly shorter than the sum, 2.94 Å , of the van der Waals radii (Rowland & Taylor, 1996), and secondly, it has been convincingly demonstrated that Br atoms bonded to C atoms are extremely poor acceptors even from good hydrogen-bond donors, such as O-H and N-H, and correspondingly worse from a weak donor, such as C-H (Brammer et al, 2001;Thallapally & Nangia, 2001). (Thanigaimani et al, 2015), is also an isomer of compound (II) but with the locations of the aryl and naphthyl units interchanged. Compound (V) also crystallizes in the space group P1, with reduced cell repeat vectors also similar to those of compounds (II) and (V), and with the interaxial angles all greater than 90 , although (V) is not isostructural with (II).…”
Section: Br34mentioning
confidence: 99%