1997
DOI: 10.1021/ic961361b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Charge Transfer Complex Involving ReH5(PPh3)3

Abstract: A new intermolecular charge transfer (CT) band at 305 nm has been observed in the UV−visible spectrum between ReH5(PPh3)3 and the hydroquinone form of p-chloranil in a mixed CH2Cl2−n-hexanes solution. Formation constants (1600 dm3/mol at 25 °C) have been measured according to a Benesi−Hildebrand treatment and the thermodynamic parameters (−ΔH° = 25.8 kJ/mol; −ΔS° = 25 J/mol; −ΔG° = 18 kJ/mol) have been calculated for this strong CT complexation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may seem somewhat anomalous if one considers the significantly different charge-transfer character of the (excited-state) encounter complex relative to the (ground-state) EDA complex as evaluated by the ( b / a ) 2 ratio for the degree of charge transfer in the Mulliken formulation ( vide supra ). For example, the latter can be evaluated directly from the enthalpy and charge-transfer data as ( b / a ) 2 ≃ −Δ H EDA / h ν CT (evaluated in Chart 4 and Table ); and the “degree of charge transfer” is found to be 0.3 in the encounter complex, but only 0.05 in the EDA complex. Thus, the formation enthalpies are rather insensitive to the charge-transfer character of the excited encounter complex relative to the ground-state complex, especially at the limited levels of the degree of charge transfer shown by quinone/aromatic donor−acceptor pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may seem somewhat anomalous if one considers the significantly different charge-transfer character of the (excited-state) encounter complex relative to the (ground-state) EDA complex as evaluated by the ( b / a ) 2 ratio for the degree of charge transfer in the Mulliken formulation ( vide supra ). For example, the latter can be evaluated directly from the enthalpy and charge-transfer data as ( b / a ) 2 ≃ −Δ H EDA / h ν CT (evaluated in Chart 4 and Table ); and the “degree of charge transfer” is found to be 0.3 in the encounter complex, but only 0.05 in the EDA complex. Thus, the formation enthalpies are rather insensitive to the charge-transfer character of the excited encounter complex relative to the ground-state complex, especially at the limited levels of the degree of charge transfer shown by quinone/aromatic donor−acceptor pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%