2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(02)00397-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Clinical Severity Scoring System for Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy of the Upper Limb

Abstract: A scoring system for the clinical severity of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) is proposed. The following signs and symptoms were considered to be significant: pain, reduction of finger flexion, swelling, temperature changes, discolouration, sensory disturbances, shoulder pain and loss of movement, increased sweating, and hair/nail growth changes. One point was assigned for strong expression of most of these features, half a point for moderate expression and no point if the feature was absent. A total score … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 75 patients, 68 women (91%) and seven men (9%), with a mean age of 58 (range 38-82) years were diagnosed as having CRPS Type 1, based on our own diagnostic algorithm (CRPS score) (Table 1) (Zyluk, 2003). All the patients included in the study experienced severe pain at rest, or on the slightest movement, and had a CRPS score greater than or equal to four points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 75 patients, 68 women (91%) and seven men (9%), with a mean age of 58 (range 38-82) years were diagnosed as having CRPS Type 1, based on our own diagnostic algorithm (CRPS score) (Table 1) (Zyluk, 2003). All the patients included in the study experienced severe pain at rest, or on the slightest movement, and had a CRPS score greater than or equal to four points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hair and nail growth changes and shoulder pain and loss of movement were only assigned half a point when present because they are less important to the diagnosis and to the morbidity of the condition. A total score of four points was assumed, empirically, to indicate a mild degree of CRPS Type 1 and a maximum score of 10 to indicate a severe degree of the condition (Zyluk, 2003). The CRPS score includes all the above parameters, except grip strength and, therefore, we considered it a primary outcome measure in our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not consider other tests, such as radiography and bone scintigraphy to be helpful in making the diagnosis (Zyluk, 1999). We used a scoring system for assessment of the presence and clinical severity of CRPS Type 1 described by Zyluk (2003) ( Table 1). A total score of 4, or more, indicates a mild degree of CRPS Type 1 and the maximum score of 10 indicates the most severe form of CRPS Type 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, VAS was 8/10 before combined treatment; at 1 month follow‐up after the beginning of combined treatment, pain level was: VAS = 6/10; at 2 months follow‐up, pain level was: VAS = 3/10. Furthermore, a scoring system for the clinical severity of CRPS‐SHS was performed [15]. With this scale, patients with a total score of 4 or more were considered to have CRPS‐SHS.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%