1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0248(97)00209-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new cobalt oxide electrodeposit bath for solar absorbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference is the use of KNO 3 and H 2 SiF 6 for obtaining Cr 2 O 3 . KNO 3 acts as an oxidizing agent [31] while fluorosilicates stabilizes the oxide phase [32]. It has been reported that NO 3 − and fluoride compounds catalyze the formation of the oxide phase [32].…”
Section: Surface Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is the use of KNO 3 and H 2 SiF 6 for obtaining Cr 2 O 3 . KNO 3 acts as an oxidizing agent [31] while fluorosilicates stabilizes the oxide phase [32]. It has been reported that NO 3 − and fluoride compounds catalyze the formation of the oxide phase [32].…”
Section: Surface Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The durability test showed that the coating had good stability at high temperatures of 450 °C for 48 h. However, the multiple repetitions of the coating using a fix speed rate of dip-coating had a weakness, namely it created many defects which influenced the mechanical and optical characteristics of the films [37]. As a comparison, the electrochemical method used to synthesize a cobalt oxide selective absorber on various substrates gives α=0.92-0.96 and ε=0.04-0.18 [76][77][78]. Overall, it can be concluded that the cobalt oxide selective absorber produced by the sol-gel dip-coating method is quite comparable with the electrochemical-based cobalt oxide selective absorber.…”
Section: Cobalt Oxide-based Absorbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid such hindrances, requirement of precise tracking and high cost engrossment will be needed, which add some more minuses to the proposed design. Effort on solar selective coatings by Farooq and Raja (2008) [4] and cobalt electrodeposition on absorber tubes by Barrera et al (1998) [5] enhance the efficiency for performance of solar devices. But radiation thermal losses may increase with increase in coating temperature, thus results in development of high thermal stresses in the collector tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%