2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-120369/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Comprehensive Oral Health Literacy Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

Abstract: Background: It has been widely accepted that oral health status is related to oral health literacy. The need to measure oral health literacy has led to the development of measurement instruments. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive instrument for adults and to examine its reliability and validity in China.Methods: A three-step design process was used. First, a literature review and expert panel discussion were used to draw up a 37-item pool covering oral health knowledge, belief, practice, skill and fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Delphi technique is a systematic and interactive method to achieve a general agreement or convergence of opinions on a particular topic 51 . It has proven to be a reliable method to develop new concepts 52 and establish consensus across a range of subject areas, 53 including several in the field of HL measurements 19,54–56 . In the present study, two phases were conducted: (a) item development of HLS‐HK by evidence synthesis using a deductive method and (b) content validity of HLS‐HK employing a modified e‐Delphi survey with healthcare consumers and providers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Delphi technique is a systematic and interactive method to achieve a general agreement or convergence of opinions on a particular topic 51 . It has proven to be a reliable method to develop new concepts 52 and establish consensus across a range of subject areas, 53 including several in the field of HL measurements 19,54–56 . In the present study, two phases were conducted: (a) item development of HLS‐HK by evidence synthesis using a deductive method and (b) content validity of HLS‐HK employing a modified e‐Delphi survey with healthcare consumers and providers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this letter inquiries were evaluated by experts' enthusiasm, expert authority coe cient (Cr), and Kendall's W coe cient; extreme value method (CR) and Pearson's correlation coe cient were used for item analysis of the questionnaire; content validity was based on item content Validity (I-CVI) and scale content validity (S-CVI) were analyzed, and construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and con rmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability and test-retest reliability were tested, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically signi cant [9] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this letter inquiries were evaluated by experts' enthusiasm, expert authority coe cient (Cr), and Kendall's W coe cient; critical ratio(CR) method and Pearson's correlation coe cient were used for item analysis of the scale; content validity was based on item content Validity (I-CVI) and scale content validity (S-CVI) were analyzed, and construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and con rmatory factor analysis (CFA). The reliability and retest reliability were tested, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically signi cant [9] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%