2018
DOI: 10.1002/uog.19035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new comprehensive paradigm for prenatal diagnosis: seeing the forest through the trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most real-life clinical situations, geneticists and other workers in prenatal diagnosis struggle daily with the equilibrium between their clients’ right to know and the professional limitations of insufficient knowledge and scientific uncertainty. Professionals would welcome some kind of guidance 9–14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most real-life clinical situations, geneticists and other workers in prenatal diagnosis struggle daily with the equilibrium between their clients’ right to know and the professional limitations of insufficient knowledge and scientific uncertainty. Professionals would welcome some kind of guidance 9–14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Belgian approach sparks worldwide discussion. It has the advantage to prevent inconsistencies between genetic centres within the same country9–14 and avoids parental anxiety and needless terminations of pregnancy in case of VOUS 23 24. On the other hand, this approach can be viewed on as paternalistic, raising concerns about the legal implications and ignoring the personal wishes of the patient and with progressing knowledge non-communicated VOUS can become relevant later, leading to inconsistent counselling over several years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these data, it has been argued that its accuracy detecting this chromosomal abnormality is very similar to very precise diagnostic invasive techniques such as amniocentesis but entraining no risk and hence ‘it has been advertised repeatedly in the press as the method to replace amniocentesis’ (Borrell and Stergiotou, 2015, p. 508). According to Borrell (2018), this misconception of cfDNA as a safer alternative to amniocentesis is based on its commercial name (NIPT) and it has been used for marketing purposes, implying invasive procedures will not be required. Most experts (within them, Gray and Wilkins-Haug, 2018; Petersen et al, 2017; Smith et al, 2014) agree, however, that NIPT cannot replace diagnostic invasive techniques to confirm foetal chromosomal disorders.…”
Section: Evolution Of Prenatal Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most experts (within them, Gray and Wilkins-Haug, 2018; Petersen et al, 2017; Smith et al, 2014) agree, however, that NIPT cannot replace diagnostic invasive techniques to confirm foetal chromosomal disorders. Besides, the NIPT have been correctly validated for trisomy 21 singleton foetuses (99%) but not for twins and are not able to detect other aneuploidies (Borrell, 2018; Gray and Wilkins-Haug, 2018).…”
Section: Evolution Of Prenatal Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation