2017
DOI: 10.4081/vl.2017.6636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new compression pressure measuring device

Abstract: Not available

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because more pressure is exerted with a higher inlay yarn insertion density. The theoretical pressure values calculated using the equation did not accurately predict the values found using the experimental method due to several limitations, as explained by other researchers [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. The correlation coefficient of the interface pressure using both experimental and theoretical methods was found to be 0.632, as shown in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is because more pressure is exerted with a higher inlay yarn insertion density. The theoretical pressure values calculated using the equation did not accurately predict the values found using the experimental method due to several limitations, as explained by other researchers [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. The correlation coefficient of the interface pressure using both experimental and theoretical methods was found to be 0.632, as shown in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Owing to standardized IP measurement, it is possible to compare and develop new compression systems as well as to select the optimum compression option for individual clinical situations. IP is measured under the compression layer, preferably at the B1 point [ 18 , 21 , 22 ]. Commercially available measurement devices include Picopress (Microlabitalia, Padua, Italy) and Kikuhime (Meditrade, Soro, Denmark) as well as piezoresistive pressure sensors.…”
Section: Interface Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercially available measurement devices include Picopress (Microlabitalia, Padua, Italy) and Kikuhime (Meditrade, Soro, Denmark) as well as piezoresistive pressure sensors. Both types offer a comparable measurement accuracy [ 22 ]. There are also newer devices which enable real-time IP measurement.…”
Section: Interface Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%