2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4904727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new configurational bias scheme for sampling supramolecular structures

Abstract: We present a new simulation scheme which allows an efficient sampling of reconfigurable supramolecular structures made of polymeric constructs functionalized by reactive binding sites. The algorithm is based on the configurational bias scheme of Siepmann and Frenkel and is powered by the possibility of changing the topology of the supramolecular network by a non-local Monte Carlo algorithm. Such a plan is accomplished by a multi-scale modelling that merges coarse-grained simulations, describing the typical pol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12] reports the general expression of α(r, h), also considering cases in which the two linkers have different lengths. For non-ideal and flexible linkers, ∆G conf AB (r, h) is usually calculated using Monte Carlo methods [135,[150][151][152]. To derive an expression for ∆G conf AB (h) valid for the case in which linkers A and/or B are mobile, the corresponding fixed-linker expression (e.g.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12] reports the general expression of α(r, h), also considering cases in which the two linkers have different lengths. For non-ideal and flexible linkers, ∆G conf AB (r, h) is usually calculated using Monte Carlo methods [135,[150][151][152]. To derive an expression for ∆G conf AB (h) valid for the case in which linkers A and/or B are mobile, the corresponding fixed-linker expression (e.g.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that non-specific (e.g. electrostatic or steric) interaction between linkers are sometimes accounted for in the derivation of the linker-linker complexation free energy [135,151,152] (see Sec. 4.1), so far we have neglected non-specific interactions between linkers that do not belong to the same complex.…”
Section: Non Specific Interactions Between Linkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57][58][59] To produce dashed curves ∆G 0 has been corrected with an attractive term (2 kJ mol been developed to calculate the free energy of multivalent interactions. 26,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Considering a set of interacting multivalent objects, these methods attempt to enumerate all possible configurations of the supramolecular network of linkers mediating the interactions. The success of these theories enabled the development of efficient simulation schemes for characterising the phase behaviour of multivalent objects, coarse-grained as simple particles with effective pair interactions.…”
Section: D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,25 Analytical methods capable of capturing the resulting entropic effects have been recently developed. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Such theories have been utilised to calculate effective potentials in DNA mediated interactions between solid [26][27][28][29][30][31] and deformable paricles, [35][36][37][38][39] as well as to design superselective probes. 20,25,[32][33][34][35]40 Analytical models have however limited applicability to those biologically and technologically relevant scenarios where non-specific contributions significantly affect the interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic bottlenecks, limiting the number of binding/unbinding events between complexes, are overcome by dedicated Monte Carlo moves in which complexes tethered to backbones are bound/unbound in a single step of the algorithm. The methodology is based on configurational bias moves [26][27][28][29] powered by topological jumps as previously tested when studying hybridization of tethered single-stranded DNA carrying reactive sticky ends, and adsorption of ideal chains on functionalized interfaces 30 . We stress that the proposed methodology is general allowing the study of different types of supramolecular linkages (as specified by size, strength, or directionality) and how they influence large-scale properties of the aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%