2018 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Niigata 2018 -ECCE Asia) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/ipec.2018.8507780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Control Method for Triple-Active Bridge Converter with Feed Forward Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, when applied to more advanced modulation techniques with more degrees of freedom, time-domain analysis becomes extremely complicated. To overcome this, fundamental component analysis (FCA) has been proposed to simplify the steady-state design, ZVS criteria investigation, and optimization of the MAB converter [3,65,[111][112][113]. However, higher-order harmonics of the square wave voltages and inductor currents are not taken into account which may lead to significant inaccuracy, especially with small phase shifts and/or small duty cycles that yield AC voltages rich in higher odd-order harmonics.…”
Section: Non-linear Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, when applied to more advanced modulation techniques with more degrees of freedom, time-domain analysis becomes extremely complicated. To overcome this, fundamental component analysis (FCA) has been proposed to simplify the steady-state design, ZVS criteria investigation, and optimization of the MAB converter [3,65,[111][112][113]. However, higher-order harmonics of the square wave voltages and inductor currents are not taken into account which may lead to significant inaccuracy, especially with small phase shifts and/or small duty cycles that yield AC voltages rich in higher odd-order harmonics.…”
Section: Non-linear Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking only the first harmonic into account considerably reduces the computational effort of steady-state analysis and, consequently, many papers consider only fundamental frequency analysis (FCA) [3,65,[111][112][113]. The FCA can be imprecise since the higher oddorder components of the waveforms are not taken into account for power flow calculation (and the error can be considerable in some conditions), thus, its use is mostly limited to resonant-type MAB converters.…”
Section: Modelling Approaches To Derive Power Flow Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Power tracking control was achieved by applying proportional-integral (PI) control to this conventional control model [12]. In addition, improvements in the control response using a feed-forward compensator are addressed for a voltage-fed type TAB converter [13], [14]. As for the current-fed type TAB converter, state feedback using the state-space averaging method was applied [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feedforward compensator based control method is proposed in [11], which decouples the control loops dynamically with pre-calculated gains stored as a look-up table in the controller. This approach is improved with feedforward control in [12] or reformulated using conjugated variables in [13]. Another control technique decouples the control loops by choosing different bandwidths for the single-input single-output (SISO) loops [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%