International Petroleum Technology Conference 2007
DOI: 10.2523/11101-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Correlation for Calculating Wellhead Production Considering Influences of Temperature, GOR, and Water-Cut for Artificially Lifted Wells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature search for papers pertaining to multiphase flow through wellhead chokes revealed that multiple researchers have developed empirically and theoretically derived correlations for the prediction of multiphase flow through wellhead chokes. The empirical correlation that appeared to be the most directly applicable was developed by Gilbert (1954) for critical multiphase flow through a wellhead choke, which takes the following form (Poettmann and Beck 1963;Omana et al 1969;Fortunati 1972;Ashford 1974;Ashford and Pierce 1975;Sachdeva et al 1986;Ajienka and Ikoku 1987;Al-Attar and Abdul-Majeed 1988;Surbey et al 1988Surbey et al , 1989Ghassan and Maha 1991;Osman and Dhokla 1992;Perkins 1993;Ajienka et al 1994;Al-Towailib and Al-Marhoun 1994;Elgibaly and Nashawi 1998;Guo et al 2002Guo et al , 2007Burstev et al 2006;Schuller et al 2003Schuller et al , 2006Alsafran and Kelkar 2007;Ghareeb and Shedid 2007;Al-Attar 2008, 2010Nasriani and Kalantariasl 2011):…”
Section: Methodology Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature search for papers pertaining to multiphase flow through wellhead chokes revealed that multiple researchers have developed empirically and theoretically derived correlations for the prediction of multiphase flow through wellhead chokes. The empirical correlation that appeared to be the most directly applicable was developed by Gilbert (1954) for critical multiphase flow through a wellhead choke, which takes the following form (Poettmann and Beck 1963;Omana et al 1969;Fortunati 1972;Ashford 1974;Ashford and Pierce 1975;Sachdeva et al 1986;Ajienka and Ikoku 1987;Al-Attar and Abdul-Majeed 1988;Surbey et al 1988Surbey et al , 1989Ghassan and Maha 1991;Osman and Dhokla 1992;Perkins 1993;Ajienka et al 1994;Al-Towailib and Al-Marhoun 1994;Elgibaly and Nashawi 1998;Guo et al 2002Guo et al , 2007Burstev et al 2006;Schuller et al 2003Schuller et al , 2006Alsafran and Kelkar 2007;Ghareeb and Shedid 2007;Al-Attar 2008, 2010Nasriani and Kalantariasl 2011):…”
Section: Methodology Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to quality and scope of data upon which they are based, the validity of those correlations is limited. The most popular correlation was developed by Gilbert (1954) but it is valid for critical flow occurring when the upstream pressure of the choke is at least 70 % higher than the downstream pressure or when the ratio of downstream pressure to upstream pressure is equal to 0.588 (Ghareeb and Shedid, 2007). The most popular correlation was developed by Gilbert (1954) but it is valid for critical flow occurring when the upstream pressure of the choke is at least 70 % higher than the downstream pressure (Ghareeb et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%