2019
DOI: 10.3311/ppch.12754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Correlation Method for Estimating Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Dioxide in Liquid, Vapor and Supercritical Phases

Abstract: In this study, a new correlation for estimating thermal conductivity (TC) of carbon dioxide was developed based on 2319 data points. The data points were at the temperature ranging from 250 to 1100 K, pressure ranging from 1 to 3000 bar and density ranging from 0.3 to 1400 Kg.m-3 in different phases of liquid, vapor and supercritical. The statistical parameters including average absolute deviation (AAD%), average percent relative error (ARE%), sum of absolute residual (SAR) and the coefficient of determination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is not generalized and presents several adjustable parameters. Recently, Rostamian et al have developed an empirical model based on previous works done by Amooey and Rostami et al This model depends on the temperature, pressure, and density and has ten adjustable parameters. The density calculations have been done using the Redlich–Kwong EoS.…”
Section: Results For Pure Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model is not generalized and presents several adjustable parameters. Recently, Rostamian et al have developed an empirical model based on previous works done by Amooey and Rostami et al This model depends on the temperature, pressure, and density and has ten adjustable parameters. The density calculations have been done using the Redlich–Kwong EoS.…”
Section: Results For Pure Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density calculations have been done using the Redlich−Kwong EoS. The results reported by Rostamian et al 60 show deviations of 1.98% (max. 38.00%).…”
Section: Results For Pure Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%