A new CT reconstruction technique using adaptive deformation recovery and intensity correction (ADRIC)

Abstract

Purpose Sequential same-patient CT images may involve deformation-induced and non-deformation-induced voxel intensity changes. An adaptive deformation recovery and intensity correction (ADRIC) technique was developed to improve the CT reconstruction accuracy, and to separate deformation from non-deformation-induced voxel intensity changes between sequential CT images. Materials and Methods ADRIC views the new CT volume as a deformation of a prior high-quality CT volume, but with additional non-deformation-induced voxel intensity changes. ADRIC first applies the 2D-3D deformation technique to recover the deformation field between the prior CT volume and the new, to-be-reconstructed CT volume. Using the deformation-recovered new CT volume, ADRIC further corrects the non-deformation-induced voxel intensity changes with an updated algebraic reconstruction technique (‘ART-dTV’). The resulting intensity-corrected new CT volume is subsequently fed back into the 2D-3D deformation process to further correct the residual deformation errors, which forms an iterative loop. By ADRIC, the deformation field and the non-deformation voxel intensity corrections are optimized separately and alternately to reconstruct the final CT. CT myocardial perfusion imaging scenarios were employed to evaluate the efficacy of ADRIC, using both simulated data of the extended-cardiac-torso (XCAT) digital phantom and experimentally acquired porcine data. The reconstruction accuracy of the ADRIC technique was compared to the technique using ART-dTV alone, and to the technique using 2D-3D deformation alone. The relative error metric and the universal quality index metric are calculated between the images for quantitative analysis. The relative error is defined as the square root of the sum of squared voxel intensity differences between the reconstructed volume and the ‘ground-truth’ volume, normalized by the square root of the sum of squared ‘ground-truth’ voxel intensities. In addition to the XCAT and porcine studies, a physical lung phantom measurement study was also conducted. Water-filled balloons with various shapes/volumes and concentrations of iodinated contrasts were put inside the phantom to simulate both deformations and non-deformation-induced intensity changes for ADRIC reconstruction. The ADRIC-solved deformations and intensity changes from limited-view projections were compared to those of the ‘gold-standard’ volumes reconstructed from fully-sampled projections. Results For the XCAT simulation study, the relative errors of the reconstructed CT volume by the 2D-3D deformation technique, the ART-dTV technique and the ADRIC technique were 14.64%, 19.21% and 11.90% respectively, by using 20 projections for reconstruction. Using 60 projections for reconstruction reduced the relative errors to 12.33%, 11.04% and 7.92% for the three techniques, respectively. For the porcine study, the corresponding results were 13.61%, 8.78%, 6.80% by using 20 projections; and 12.14%, 6.91% and 5.29% by using 60 projections. The ADRIC technique also dem...

Advanced 4-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography reconstruction by combining motion estimation, motion-compensated reconstruction, biomechanical modeling and deep learning

“…7b) shows the similarity between the reconstructed CBCT images by SMEIR-Bio and SMEIR-Unet, demonstrating that both methods were capable of reconstructing accurate and high-quality CBCT images. We also computed two image quality metrics, the RMSE [39] and the UQI [33], to compare SMEIR-Bio and SMEIR-Unet to the original SMEIR algorithm, based on 10 lung region-of-interests (ROIs) focusing on fine details. For SMEIR-Bio, the average RMSE of the 10 evaluated ROIs was 0.0033 and the average UQI was 0.87.…”

“…The incorporation of highquality prior information also introduces more accurate Hounsfield units [30], and allows further imaging dose reduction by acquiring fewer projections for reconstruction. However, this technique cannot reconstruct non-deformation-induced intensity changes in new CBCT volumes, since the new CBCT is simplified as a purely deformed volume of the prior image [33].…”

Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review

“…Several groups have utilized VCTs to evaluate their novel CT image reconstruction algorithms. [305][306][307] Abadi et al 141,308 characterized the noise texture across filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction algorithms. In this study, an XCAT phantom 41,55 was imaged 50 times using a validated CT simulator, setup to mimic the parameters and settings of a specific scanner model (Siemens Definition Flash).…”

Iterative reconstruction for photon-counting CT using prior image constrained total generalized variation

“…The simulation was performed at 80 kV, and the corresponding spectrum ( Fig. 3) was divided into six energy bins: [20,30] keV, [30,40] keV, [40,50] keV, [50,60]…”

“…One straightforward solution is to reduce the number of projections needed to reconstruct the spectral CT images. However, this reduction will cause severe artifacts in the reconstructed images because the FBP algorithm requires the number of projections to satisfy the Shannon sampling theorem [28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”