2016
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new custom microarray for sRNA profiling inEscherichia coli

Abstract: Bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) play essential roles in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression. To improve their detection by conventional microarrays, we designed a custom microarray containing a group of probes targeting known and some putative Escherichia coli sRNAs. To assess its potential in detection of sRNAs, RNA profiling experiments were performed with total RNA extracted from E. coli MG1655 cells exponentially grown in rich (Luria-Bertani) and minimal (M9/glucose) media. We found that many … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of pyruvate and glucose as alternative carbon sources made it possible to compare the transcriptome profiles of E. coli cells that grow by utilizing either glycolytic (growth on M9/glucose) or gluconeogenetic (growth on M9/pyruvate) pathways. Analysis of gene expression differences was carried out by employing a custom microarray recently developed for simultaneous profiling of protein-coding genes and sRNAs in E. coli (Ruiz-Larrabeiti et al 2016). Moreover, the results of the transcriptome profiling were further compared with protein expression data obtained by two-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The use of pyruvate and glucose as alternative carbon sources made it possible to compare the transcriptome profiles of E. coli cells that grow by utilizing either glycolytic (growth on M9/glucose) or gluconeogenetic (growth on M9/pyruvate) pathways. Analysis of gene expression differences was carried out by employing a custom microarray recently developed for simultaneous profiling of protein-coding genes and sRNAs in E. coli (Ruiz-Larrabeiti et al 2016). Moreover, the results of the transcriptome profiling were further compared with protein expression data obtained by two-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total RNA was isolated by using a modified hot phenol RNA extraction method (Khodursky et al 2003;Ruiz-Larrabeiti et al 2016). Briefly, aliquots of cell cultures grown in triplicate in M9/pyruvate or M9/glucose medium at 37°C with shaking (200 rpm) until OD 460 ∼ 0.4-0.6 were mixed with cold stop solution (5% phenol in ethanol) at an 8:1 ratio.…”
Section: Rna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PAP I adds poly(A) tails to many different classes of cellular RNAs (mRNAs, rRNAs, tRNAs, sRNAs, viral RNAs) (Régnier and Hajnsdorf 2013;Mohanty and Kushner 2016), and while the majority of E. coli ORFs undergo polyadenylation under exponential growth conditions, only a small fraction of them are polyadenylated at a specific time (Mohanty and Kushner 2006). Many sRNAs that do not require Hfq for stability and function have been shown to be polyadenylated in vivo, e.g., RNA I, Sok, Oop, SraL, SraG, and GlmY, and are subsequently degraded by exoribonucleases (Régnier and Hajnsdorf 2013;Ruiz-Larrabeiti et al 2016). Interestingly, previous data have shown that sRNAs that require Hfq for their stability, e.g., MicA and RybB, can also be targeted for degradation by PNPase and PAP I, but only when these sRNAs are not bound by Hfq (Andrade and Arraiano 2008;Andrade et al 2012;Cameron and De Lay 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%