2019
DOI: 10.24200/sci.2019.50131.1529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new decision approach for the sustainable transport investment selection based on the generalized entropy and knowledge measure under an interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment

Abstract: Finding the most suitable transport project is one of the most important tasks of transport planning. This task gets more complicated as the sustainable criteria get involved. In this paper, a new method of multi-criteria group decision-making with unknown attribute and expert weights is proposed to address the sustainable transport investment selection problem. To make the method more powerful in dealing with uncertain elements, an Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy (IVPF) set is used as a useful tool to handl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria considered for assessment are based on a comprehensive review of various recent studies (Salling and Pryn, 2015, Mohagheghi et al. , 2017 and Aghamohagheghi et al. , 2021) on sustainability perspectives.…”
Section: Case Study – Sustainable Transport Investment Project (Stip)...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria considered for assessment are based on a comprehensive review of various recent studies (Salling and Pryn, 2015, Mohagheghi et al. , 2017 and Aghamohagheghi et al. , 2021) on sustainability perspectives.…”
Section: Case Study – Sustainable Transport Investment Project (Stip)...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit-type attributes are A 1 (investment return), A 3 (reduction in costs), A 4 (security), A 5 (affordability), A 6 (employment), A 7 (basic accessibility), A 8 (GHG emissions), A 9 (climate and global warming) and A 10 (resource efficiency). The criteria considered for assessment are based on a comprehensive review of various recent studies (Salling and Pryn, 2015, Mohagheghi et al, 2017and Aghamohagheghi et al, 2021 on sustainability perspectives. The cost-type attribute is A 2 (financial risk).…”
Section: Comprehensive Description Of Evaluation Attributes For Stipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be transformed into a multi-criteria decision-making problem where the alternatives are the candidate projects, and the criteria are the project complexity drivers. Given the inherent ambiguity in the concept of project complexity and the uncertainties in its drivers, the input data for the factors affecting complexity drivers can be quantified using fuzzy numbers as a feasible method [48].…”
Section: Proposed Model To Measure Project Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei and Zhang (2015) developed an entropy for IVIFSs based on the cosine function. Biswas and Sarkar (2019) defined entropy for PFS while Peng and Li (2019) and Aghamohagheghi et al (2021) introduced their distinctive entropy definitions for interval‐valued PFS (IVPFS). Aydoğdu (2015) presented an entropy for interval‐valued NS (IVNS).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%