A new divergence measure for basic probability assignment and its applications in extremely uncertain environments

Abstract

Information fusion under extremely uncertain environments is an important issue in pattern classification and decision‐making problems. The Dempster‐Shafer evidence theory (D‐S theory) is more and more extensively applied in dealing with uncertain information. However, the results contrary to common sense are often obtained when combining different evidence using Dempster's combination rule. How to measure the difference between different evidence is still an open issue. In this paper, a new divergence is proposed based on the Kullback‐Leibler divergence to measure the difference between different basic probability assignments (BPAs). Numerical examples are used to illustrate the computational process of the proposed divergence. Then, the similarity for different BPAs is also defined based on the proposed divergence. The basic knowledge about pattern recognition is introduced, and a new classification algorithm is presented using the proposed divergence and similarity under extremely uncertain environments. The effectiveness of the classification algorithm is illustrated by a small example handling robot sensing. The proposed method is motivated by the urgent need to develop intelligent systems, such as sensor‐based data fusion manipulators, which are required to work in complicated, extremely uncertain environments. Sensory data satisfy the conditions (1) fragmentary and (2) collected from multiple levels of resolution.

On interval‐valued fuzzy decision‐making using soft likelihood functions

“…Fuzzy logic was developed by Zadeh and Mamdani and Assilian, based on which the concept of approximate reasoning was introduced and showed that vague logical statements enable the formation of algorithms that can use vague data to derive vague inferences. Many theories have been promoted by this method, such as Dempster‐Shafer theory, Z‐numbers, and fuzzy reasoning . The definition of fuzzy sets is given as follows:…”

On Pythagorean fuzzy decision making using soft likelihood functions

“…We can come to the conclusion that PFS can represent more uncertainty than IFS, consequently, PFS is more useful than IFS in MCDM issues. Furthermore, PFS has been extensively investigated from multiple perspectives, such as aggregation operators, decision methods and other applications …”

On intuitionistic fuzzy decision‐making using soft likelihood functions

“…The intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) proposed by Atanassov can be seen as the generalization of the fuzzy sets presented by Zadeh, which can be denoted as an intuitionistic fuzzy number (IFN) for a single element. IFSs can represent more information than fuzzy sets by including membership and nonmembership degrees in its framework, which extends its applications in many fields, such as pattern recognition, especially multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) problems …”