2005
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact

Abstract: In 2004 a law was introduced in The Netherlands, which gives offspring conceived by semen or oocyte donation the right to know the identity of the donor. The law also regulates the provision of other information concerning the donor to the offspring, their parents or their general practitioner. With the introduction of this law, a choice has been made in which the wish of offspring prevails above others involved. Donors can no longer claim absolute anonymity; they are anonymous at the time of donation, but if … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while the number of infertile couples requesting AID has remained constant, the gap between those providing donations and those requesting AID has widened. 16,17 In the United States, a 'double track' policy has become increasingly popular. Under this policy, the donor can choose to be either an anonymous or an identified donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the number of infertile couples requesting AID has remained constant, the gap between those providing donations and those requesting AID has widened. 16,17 In the United States, a 'double track' policy has become increasingly popular. Under this policy, the donor can choose to be either an anonymous or an identified donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries where donor anonymity has been abolished and disclosure is possible after children born of donated embryos have attained a certain age i.e. 18 years old [7,8], the situation can be even more psychologically disturbing for prospective donor couples. On the other hand, former patients who have decided to donate for the treatment of other infertile couples, often cite their perception of frozen embryos as 'living entities,' and their subsequent moral inhibition against the destruction of a potential human life in either stem cell research or embryo disposal [3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinics fear that, if anonymity is removed, this will drastically reduce the number of donors as well as the number of families that come to Spain to receive assisted reproduction treatments. Currently available empirical evidence supporting the idea that removing anonymity would reduce the number of donors is not conclusive; studies (Daniels and Lalos 1995;Janssens et al 2006;Blyth and Frith 2008;Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2013) show that what usually occurs is a temporary decrease and a change in the profile of donors.…”
Section: Context: Assisted Reproduction In Spainmentioning
confidence: 99%