2016
DOI: 10.5710/amgh.26.10.2015.2931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Early Miocene (Aquitanian) Elasmobranchii Assemblage from the la Guajira Peninsula, Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was previously known from the late Miocene of Mexico (González-Rodríguez et al, 2013). The same applies to Carcharhinus gibbesii, the youngest record was reported by Carrillo-Briceño et al (2016) as the Aquitanian of Colombia. In reference to the batoid cf.…”
Section: Paleodiversity Significancementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was previously known from the late Miocene of Mexico (González-Rodríguez et al, 2013). The same applies to Carcharhinus gibbesii, the youngest record was reported by Carrillo-Briceño et al (2016) as the Aquitanian of Colombia. In reference to the batoid cf.…”
Section: Paleodiversity Significancementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Early Neogene marine elasmobranch assemblages known from the Americas are summarized in Figure 15 and include North America (Purdy et al, 2001;Visaggi and Godfrey, 2010), Southern South America (Suarez et al, 2006;Cione et al, 2011) and Tropical America (Leriche, 1938;Casier, 1966;MacPhee et al, 2003;Alván et al, 2006;Portell et al, 2008;Costa et al, 2009;Aguilera and Lundberg, 2010;Pimiento et al, 2013b, Laurito et al, 2014Carrillo-Briceño et al, 2016). From these assemblages the Uitpa Formation (Colombia) has been referred to the Aquitanian (Carrillo-Briceño et al, 2016), while the Calvert and Pungo River formations in North America (Purdy et al, 2001; Visaggi and Godfrey, 2010) and the Cantaure (in this work) and Castillo (Rincón et al, 2014) formations in Venezuela, have been referred to the Burdiga- lian. The remaining formations ( Figure 15) have been assigned to an unresolved early Miocene age.…”
Section: Paleodiversity Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the extirpation of the kitefin shark Dalatias and the sawshark Pristiophorus from EP at the end of the Neogene is intriguing. Pristiophorus had a wider distribution in the American continent during Miocene and Pliocene times ( Carrillo-Briceño et al, 2016a ); however, only one extant species ( Pristiophorus schroederi ) with a reduced distribution, inhabits the northern most part of the TNWA province, living over continental and insular slopes between 400 and 1,000 m ( Kiraly, Moore & Jasinski, 2003 ). In the reference to Dalatias , the extant species prefers deep-water environments near the continental slope, although also it has been referred in shallower waters ( Carrillo-Briceño et al, 2016a , fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The Neogene fossil record of Dalatias and Pristiophorus in the Americas indicates that these taxa have been inhabitants of both shallow and deep-water environments ( Carrillo-Briceño et al, 2013 , 2015b , 2016a , and references therein), which could have allowed a high vagility to overcome aquatic barriers associated to sea level and habitat loss. The extirpation of Dalatias , Pristiophorus , as well other marine fauna from the EP ( Rivadeneira & Marquet, 2007 ; Villafaña & Rivadeneira, 2014 ), could be correlated with the expansion of upwelling areas and the cooling of surface waters during Pliocene–Pleistocene ( Ibaraki, 1997 ; Ravelo et al, 2004 ; Lawrence, Liu & Herbert, 2006 ; Dowsett et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation