2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new effective approach for computation of reliability index in nonlinear problems of reliability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this example, Gong and Yi 11 used the finitestep-length iterative algorithm to reach the answer, and they obtained the reliability indexes b = 2.2995 and 1.8455 when P = 1 and 10 under the properly selected step-length, respectively. In Shayanfar et al, 36 the reliability indexes b are 2.3050 and 1.8459, respectively. For the compared methods in our paper, as can be seen from Table 2, HLRF fails to converge for P = 1, 5, 10, whereas both iHLRF and our proposed method can converge to the MPP with almost the same reliability index, and their reliability results under P = 1 and 10 are well agreed with previous ones.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For this example, Gong and Yi 11 used the finitestep-length iterative algorithm to reach the answer, and they obtained the reliability indexes b = 2.2995 and 1.8455 when P = 1 and 10 under the properly selected step-length, respectively. In Shayanfar et al, 36 the reliability indexes b are 2.3050 and 1.8459, respectively. For the compared methods in our paper, as can be seen from Table 2, HLRF fails to converge for P = 1, 5, 10, whereas both iHLRF and our proposed method can converge to the MPP with almost the same reliability index, and their reliability results under P = 1 and 10 are well agreed with previous ones.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Compared to methods following the three afore-mentioned three clues, methods emphasize on searching algorithms seem more efficient and accurate, which are realized by regulating the sampling process strategically through some algorithms. The family of searching algorithms for structural reliability is board and varied, in which some of the heuristic ones are directional divisions [34][35][36][37], swarm algorithms [38,39], genetic algorithms [40][41][42], gradient or difference-based algorithms [43,44], etc. Yet, further improvements on searching algorithms with respect to the following aspects are always welcomed: 1, maximizing computational efficiency by minimizing the number of redundant samplings; 2, increasing robustness by adapting to a board type range of PFs; 3, stabilization of the convergence rate; 4, customization for different engineering cases according to the requirement of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a structure, uncertainty can be observed in materials, loads and geometry. Evaluation of the probability of failure in the presence of uncertainty is the main purpose in structural reliability analysis [4][5][6]. The following definite multi-dimensional integral gives the probability of failure…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%