1991
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(91)90111-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new electrochemical method for the determination of the free surface of phosphate layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the name suggests, it combines a spray process that quickly transports ions to readily accessible surfaces by means of mostly momentum and a dip processes that transports ions to complex hidden surfaces by means of mostly diffusion. Also relevant to automotive bodies was work by Losch et al on measuring phosphate coating porosity by electrochemical means [27]. The uncoated surface area in the pores acts as an adhesion interface for ED (electrodeposition) and as a measure of coating coverage.…”
Section: Conversion Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the name suggests, it combines a spray process that quickly transports ions to readily accessible surfaces by means of mostly momentum and a dip processes that transports ions to complex hidden surfaces by means of mostly diffusion. Also relevant to automotive bodies was work by Losch et al on measuring phosphate coating porosity by electrochemical means [27]. The uncoated surface area in the pores acts as an adhesion interface for ED (electrodeposition) and as a measure of coating coverage.…”
Section: Conversion Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique presented serious limitations for thin coating analyses, since the effect of the resistance inside pores became less significant 4 . Typical porosity tests for phosphate coating analyses are the ferrocyanide test and the copper deposition test; however, electrochemical tests ensure better control of the test conditions 11 . Weng et al studied the porosity of zinc and manganese phosphate coatings 12 , using the polarization resistance technique and obtaining an average porosity of less than 1.5% for zinc and manganese coatings 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weng et al studied the porosity of zinc and manganese phosphate coatings 12 , using the polarization resistance technique and obtaining an average porosity of less than 1.5% for zinc and manganese coatings 12 . In this work, the electrochemical Voltammetric Anodic Dissolution (VAD) technique 11,13 , in which the passivation charge of the substrate is measured, is used to determine the phosphate coating porosity of galvanized steel (GS) foils prepared under different phosphatization conditions. The advantages of this technique are the short analysis time (about 1 min) and the fact that a calibration curve is unnecessary, requiring only the passivation standard charge (substrate with unitary porosity without coating).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losch et al established a method to determine the coverage of phosphate layers with CV measurements . This method was already used to analyze the coverage of different types of layers on a variety of substrates like zinc-coated steel. ,, Similar to this method, the coverage of ZM-coated steel samples by the LDH conversion layer was calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%