2008
DOI: 10.1086/587635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Estimate of the Hubble Time with Improved Modeling of Gravitational Lenses

Abstract: This paper examines free-form modeling of gravitational lenses using Bayesian ensembles of pixelated mass maps. The priors and algorithms from previous work are clarified and significant technical improvements are made. Lens reconstruction and Hubble Time recovery are tested using mock data from simple analytic models and recent galaxy-formation simulations. Finally, using published data, the Hubble Time is inferred through the simultaneous reconstruction of eleven time-delay lenses. The result is H −1 0 = 13.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After accounting for the difference in the gravitational potential traversed by the light path for each multiple image (Shapiro 1964), the time delay can be used to directly constrain the Hubble constant (Refsdal 1964) and other cosmological parameters  (Linder 2004(Linder , 2011Coe & Moustakas 2009). Distant quasars multiply-imaged by foreground galaxies have been used for such time delay cosmography measurements, providing valuable cosmological constraints that can complement or validate other methods such as Type Ia SNe, baryon acoustic oscillations and the cosmic microwave background (e.g., Saha et al 2006;Oguri 2007;Coles 2008;Suyu et al 2010Suyu et al , 2013Suyu et al , 2014; and see Treu & Ellis 2014 for a recent review). Figure 9.…”
Section: Future Measurements Of Sn Time Delaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After accounting for the difference in the gravitational potential traversed by the light path for each multiple image (Shapiro 1964), the time delay can be used to directly constrain the Hubble constant (Refsdal 1964) and other cosmological parameters  (Linder 2004(Linder , 2011Coe & Moustakas 2009). Distant quasars multiply-imaged by foreground galaxies have been used for such time delay cosmography measurements, providing valuable cosmological constraints that can complement or validate other methods such as Type Ia SNe, baryon acoustic oscillations and the cosmic microwave background (e.g., Saha et al 2006;Oguri 2007;Coles 2008;Suyu et al 2010Suyu et al , 2013Suyu et al , 2014; and see Treu & Ellis 2014 for a recent review). Figure 9.…”
Section: Future Measurements Of Sn Time Delaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the many tests and successes of this technique (e.g. Saha et al 2006a,b;Read et al 2007;Coles 2008;Leier 2009;Leier et al 2011), it is unclear whether the uniform prior on the ellipticity used to sample the parameter space is not biasing the average pixelated mass profile derived by this method. These results suggest that the dark matter and baryon distribution in the central regions (typically 5 kpc) of lens galaxies do have similar shapes 7 .…”
Section: Position Angle and Ellipticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Suyu et al (2009Suyu et al ( , 2010 showed that a detailed study of the lensed quasar CLASS B1608+656, combining different high-resolution data and advanced lens modeling techniques, could lead to an estimate of H 0 with very small random and systematic uncertainties: H 0 = 70.6 ± 3.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 . The determination of H 0 based on a large sample of lensed quasars can also reach a precision competitive with the one of standard methods (Oguri 2007;Coles 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lensing magnification also makes strong lenses natural cosmic telescopes in resolving high-redshift sources. In addition, strong lens systems involving time-variant sources such as quasars measure the Hubble constant (Refsdal 1964), applications of gravitationally lensed quasars such as time delay cosmography (e.g., Coles 2008;Suyu et al 2010) can constrain the quasar luminosity function (Richards et al 2006) and dark energy (e.g. Kochanek 1996;Oguri et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%