Advances in Computation and Intelligence
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74581-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Evolutionary Decision Theory for Many-Objective Optimization Problems

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper the authors point out that the Pareto Optimality is unfair, unreasonable and imperfect for Many-objective Optimization Problems (MOPs) underlying the hypothesis that all objectives have equal importance. The key contribution of this paper is the discovery of the new definition of optimality called ε-optimality for MOP that is based on a new conception, so called ε-dominance, which not only considers the difference of the number of superior and inferior objectives between two feasible so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of E-optimality, proposed by Reference [31] for multi-objective optimization, not only considers the difference in the number of superior and inferior objectives between two feasible solutions, but it also considers the values of improved objective functions underlying the hypothesis that all objectives in the problem have equal importance. Numerical experiments show that the definition of E-optimality is better than that of the Pareto optimality when more than three objective functions are involved [31].…”
Section: Oensga-ii Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of E-optimality, proposed by Reference [31] for multi-objective optimization, not only considers the difference in the number of superior and inferior objectives between two feasible solutions, but it also considers the values of improved objective functions underlying the hypothesis that all objectives in the problem have equal importance. Numerical experiments show that the definition of E-optimality is better than that of the Pareto optimality when more than three objective functions are involved [31].…”
Section: Oensga-ii Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] As discussed in cited papers, when it comes to MOPs, there is no single optimal solution; in fact, the output of EAs are a set of several alternative solutions. Generally, the categorization of best solution is based on the so-called human decision maker designed by Coello et al in 1999.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the categorization of best solution is based on the so‐called human decision maker designed by Coello et al in 1999. () As discussed in cited papers, when it comes to MOPs, there is no single optimal solution; in fact, the output of EAs are a set of several alternative solutions. These solutions are optimal in the wider sense since there are no other solutions in the search space that are superior to (dominate) them when all objectives are simultaneously considered.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%