2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new exact analytical approach for free vibration of Reissner–Mindlin functionally graded rectangular plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
74
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following features are evident: (1) results based on the CPT neu and FSDT match well with the analytical solutions [17,21]; (2) as the CPT, natural frequencies obtained by the CPT neu are larger than the analytical solutions; (3) the accuracy of the CPT neu is higher than that of the FSDT when the number of control points is small, whereas the accuracy of the CPT neu is almost the same as that of the FSDT with increasing number of control points. The computational time versus the number of control points is plotted in Figure 5.…”
Section: A Simply Supported Al/alsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following features are evident: (1) results based on the CPT neu and FSDT match well with the analytical solutions [17,21]; (2) as the CPT, natural frequencies obtained by the CPT neu are larger than the analytical solutions; (3) the accuracy of the CPT neu is higher than that of the FSDT when the number of control points is small, whereas the accuracy of the CPT neu is almost the same as that of the FSDT with increasing number of control points. The computational time versus the number of control points is plotted in Figure 5.…”
Section: A Simply Supported Al/alsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The same Al/Al 2 O 3 material considered in the previous section is employed. [17,21]. Figure 4 shows the comparison of the first normalized natural frequencies from the proposed method and the reference solutions with different control points.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical plate theory (CPT) (Feldman and Aboudi 1997, Javaheri and Eslami 2002, Mahdavian 2009, Mohammadi et al 2010, Chen et al 2006, Baferani et al 2011) yields acceptable results only for the thin plates, whereas accuracy of the first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT) (Mohammadi et al 2010, Croce and Venini 2004, Efraim and Eisenberger 2007, Zhao et al 2009a, b, Lee et al 2009, Hosseini-Hashemi et al 2011, Naderi and Saidi 2010, Nguyen-Xuan et al 2012, Thai and Choi 2013a) depends on the shear correction factor. Higherorder shear deformation theories with five unknown functions, which are included third-order shear deformation plate theory (TSDT), sinusoidal shear deformation plate theory (SSDT), hyperbolic shear deformable plate theory (HSDT), exponential shear deformation plate theory (ESDT), predict more accurate the response of moderate and thick FG plates (Reddy 2000, Zenkour 2006, Matsunaga 2008, Chen et al 2009, Pradyumna and Bandyopadhyay 2008, Gilhooley et al 2007, Talha and Singh 2010, Mantari and Soares 2012, 2013, Neves et al 2012a, b, Jha et al 2013, Thai and Kim 2013, Thai and Choi 2013b, Zenkour 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FSDT [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] gives acceptable prediction, but requires a shear correction factor which is hard to find out consistently because of dependent on many parameters including geometry, boundary conditions, and loading conditions. The HSDTs [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] do not require a shear correction factor, but their equations of motion are more complicated than those of the FSDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%