2017
DOI: 10.1785/0220170032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Experimental Field Study of the Effects of Explosive Detonation Products on Seismic Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Site T4 also exhibits the fastest rate of growth of the CSF6/CXe ratios as a function of the measured SF 6 concentration. It is important to notice that T4 is situated above another blasthole (Shot SH2) (Stroujkova et al, ) with a similar cavity at the bottom. Therefore, the higher tracer ratio can be explained by higher amount of water available for dissolution at that location, resulting in further depletion of the gas phase in Xe and enrichment in SF 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Site T4 also exhibits the fastest rate of growth of the CSF6/CXe ratios as a function of the measured SF 6 concentration. It is important to notice that T4 is situated above another blasthole (Shot SH2) (Stroujkova et al, ) with a similar cavity at the bottom. Therefore, the higher tracer ratio can be explained by higher amount of water available for dissolution at that location, resulting in further depletion of the gas phase in Xe and enrichment in SF 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several chemical explosions were conducted in the quarry between 2016 and 2018 to study the effect of the explosive types on explosion source phenomenology. The injection was performed on 31 October 2018 using the borehole where the chemical explosion was detonated in 2016 as a part of the GAS2016 experiment (e.g., Stroujkova et al, 2017) and designated Shot SH1 (Figure 1). For the GAS2016 experiment, the cylindrical Trinitrotoluene (TNT) charge with the yield of 63.2 kg was detonated at the bottom of a borehole (12.95 m in depth and 25 cm in diameter).…”
Section: Injection Borehole Preparation and Site Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that chemical explosives are a useful analog for understanding the rock damage following an underground nuclear explosion [11]. Modeling and experiments have been used in recent years to better understand seismic wave generation [12][13][14] gas transport [15], and rock damage [16][17][18], following underground chemical explosions. Because there are considerable differences between a nuclear and chemical explosive source, there are expected differences in the behavior of gas transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since NKTS is an uncalibrated test site, there is considerable uncertainty to the seismic‐based absolute explosion magnitude and, particularly, the absolute yield of the North Korean tests. Multiple, poorly constrained factors influence measurement of the absolute size of these tests, including the conversion of underground explosion energy to elastic (seismic) energy (i.e., degree of “coupling,” Patterson, 1966; Stroujkova, 2015; Stroujkova et al., 2017), details of the host emplacement rock (Yang, 2016; Stroujkova & Morozov, 2014), and near‐source to regional attenuation in both the crust and upper mantle (Ichinose et al., 2014; Olsen et al., 2018). The conversion of these magnitudes to yield introduces significant additional uncertainties and errors (e.g., Murphy, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%