1992
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620330605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new explicit variable time‐integration self‐starting methodology for computational structural dynamics

Abstract: SUMMARYA new explicit variable time-integration methodology and architecture which possesses self-starting attributes, eliminates the need to involve acceleration computations, and which has improved accuracy characteristics in comparison to the traditional central-difference-type formulations customarily advocated is described for applicability to computational structural dynamics. To sharpen the focus of the present study, an explicit variable time-integration architecture which is relatively simple, yet eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the first positive feature of the method is that it is truly self‐starting, eliminating any kind of cumbersome initial procedure, such as the computation of initial accelerations (which usually requires an extra system of equations to be dealt with) and/or the computation of multistep initial values. Of course, there are several other techniques that are also self‐starting (this is a standard feature of all momentum based methods, for instance), and it is interesting to observe that the explicit self‐starting methodology proposed by Tamma and D'Costa can be reproduced by the present technique by always considering α = 1 and γ = 0.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Time Integration Strategymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, the first positive feature of the method is that it is truly self‐starting, eliminating any kind of cumbersome initial procedure, such as the computation of initial accelerations (which usually requires an extra system of equations to be dealt with) and/or the computation of multistep initial values. Of course, there are several other techniques that are also self‐starting (this is a standard feature of all momentum based methods, for instance), and it is interesting to observe that the explicit self‐starting methodology proposed by Tamma and D'Costa can be reproduced by the present technique by always considering α = 1 and γ = 0.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Time Integration Strategymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…with so called local subcycling. Proposed methods that use different time steps at different nodes are for example reported in Belytschko et al [50], Neal and Belytschko [292] or Tamma and D'Costa [384]. Some of them still struggle with problems of momentum conservation at time step interfaces.…”
Section: Explicit or Implicit Time Integration Schemes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (continued) allocation of timesteps, and by having some dissipation of high frequencies present, to prevent these instabilities. This could be done by applying partial velocity subcycling to the ''self-starting'' algorithm of Tamma and DÕCosta [4]. In this algorithm, new velocities are first found and then dissipation is introduced when displacements are updated, by making the update using a weighting v c of velocities at the start and end of the current timestep i…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem will be discussed further later. These problems are shared by related algorithms which use a nodal interface and update the large timestep side first, such as that due to Tamma and DÕCosta [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%