2010
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new familial insertion, ins(18;9)(q12.2;q33.1q31.1) with a 9q31.1–9q33.1 deletion in a girl with a cleft lip and palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these were detected using conventional chromosome banding analysis, and to date, no clear syndrome has been identified). Seven cases have currently been reported using CMA techniques with precise breakpoints that overlap the 9q31.2q32 region . These are represented graphically in Figure and aligned against the deletion seen in our cohort, with a summary of the clinical reports available in Table .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of these were detected using conventional chromosome banding analysis, and to date, no clear syndrome has been identified). Seven cases have currently been reported using CMA techniques with precise breakpoints that overlap the 9q31.2q32 region . These are represented graphically in Figure and aligned against the deletion seen in our cohort, with a summary of the clinical reports available in Table .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Seven cases have currently been reported using CMA techniques with precise breakpoints that overlap the 9q31.2q32 region. [9][10][11][12][13] These are represented graphically in Figure 3 and aligned against the deletion seen in our cohort, with a summary of the clinical reports available in Table 2. A critical overlapping area extends from chr9: 109711873-113407621 (hg18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of our patient with the 11 previously reported cases with partially overlapping deletions is provided in Table 2 and their deletion regions are compared in Fig. 5 (case 1 and case 4 came from DECIPHER, http://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-recurrent rearrangements can be explained by different models [Gu et al, 2008] and investigation of breakpoints can be useful for a better understanding of the genome structure and the mechanisms that give rise to genomic disorders [Lindstrand et al, 2010]. While subtelomeric deletions of chromosome 9q cause a relatively common and recognizable syndrome [Stewart and Kleefstra, 2007], interstitial deletions are rare and until now approximately 20 patients have been described in the medical literature, spanning the breakpoints from 9q21 to 9q34 [Gamerdinger et al, 2008;Kulharya et al, 2008;Van Bon et al, 2008;Chien et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2013]. These deletions vary in size and localization, leaving some regions underrepresented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%