1998
DOI: 10.1109/7.705890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new fourth-order processing algorithm for spaceborne SAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fourth and higher order phase errors could not be compensated in A-ESRM. A fourth-order Doppler range model (DRM4) for space-borne SAR imaging was proposed by Eldhuset [18]- [21], and a 2-D exact transfer function (ETF) was derived. Compared with the conventional hyperbolic range model, the third and fourth order phase errors can be fully compensated, and a better imaging result can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fourth and higher order phase errors could not be compensated in A-ESRM. A fourth-order Doppler range model (DRM4) for space-borne SAR imaging was proposed by Eldhuset [18]- [21], and a 2-D exact transfer function (ETF) was derived. Compared with the conventional hyperbolic range model, the third and fourth order phase errors can be fully compensated, and a better imaging result can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], Eldhuset inverted a fourth-order range equation to give an "exact" transfer function for a spaceborne monostatic SAR. This method has been extended in [21] for an bistatic azimuth-invariant spaceborne SAR.…”
Section: -D Spectrum Of a Bistatic Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a more accurate range model and a different azimuth compression reference function are required for generating high quality images, the 1-4th order Doppler parameters are necessary. Various Doppler parameter calculation algorithms have been reported for Leo-SAR, but show large errors when applied to Geo-SAR due to geometrical approximation [10][11][12][13]. Actually, in the satellite case, the geometry is more complicated, as the orbit is elliptical and the Earth is modeled as an ellipsoid rotating independently of the sensor trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%