2011
DOI: 10.1002/etep.609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new fuzzy sliding mode controller for load frequency control of large hydropower plant using particle swarm optimization algorithm and Kalman estimator

Abstract: SUMMARY The load frequency control (LFC) is very important in power system operation and control for supplying sufficient, reliable, and high‐quality electric power. The conventional LFC uses an integral controller. In this paper, a new control system based on the fuzzy sliding mode controller is proposed for controlling the load frequency of nonlinear model of a hydropower plant, and this control system is compared with the proportional–integral controller and the conventional sliding mode controller. To regu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection, parameter of the ACE variable β is 0.2083 p.u.kW/Hz [25], synchronizing power coefficient of the tie line T s is 0.0866 s [25], gain of the additional state is picked up as 0.002. The sliding surface parameters of the SMC controller in (24) T according to Ackermann's formula. Other controller parameters in (24) are picked up as κ c = 0.1 and η c = 0.1.…”
Section: Grid-connected Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this subsection, parameter of the ACE variable β is 0.2083 p.u.kW/Hz [25], synchronizing power coefficient of the tie line T s is 0.0866 s [25], gain of the additional state is picked up as 0.002. The sliding surface parameters of the SMC controller in (24) T according to Ackermann's formula. Other controller parameters in (24) are picked up as κ c = 0.1 and η c = 0.1.…”
Section: Grid-connected Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sliding surface parameters of the SMC controller in (24) T according to Ackermann's formula. Other controller parameters in (24) are picked up as κ c = 0.1 and η c = 0.1. The load disturbance ∆P L is applied to the system at t = 0.…”
Section: Grid-connected Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first stage conducts the state trajectory to the sliding surface. The second stage is the converging of the system output to the desired output, based on the desired dynamics [30]. Therefore, as the sliding surface becomes stable (i.e.…”
Section: Smcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms have become a popular choice for solving complex optimization problems because of their flexibility, generality, and ease of use. The GA and PSO techniques although are reported to minimize the chattering but they sometimes get trapped in the local minima . The other algorithms may also suffer from difficulties such as premature convergence and more computational time in case of the large dimension system .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%