2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new gas sensor electronic interface with generalized impedance converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [21], the sensor resistance range is between 500 Ω and 30 kΩ, but the range is wider in in this proposal, from 500 Ω to 100 kΩ. Due to this, some changes in the topology were introduced.…”
Section: Converter Resistance-to-frequencymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [21], the sensor resistance range is between 500 Ω and 30 kΩ, but the range is wider in in this proposal, from 500 Ω to 100 kΩ. Due to this, some changes in the topology were introduced.…”
Section: Converter Resistance-to-frequencymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On one hand, the capacitor C3 of the Figure 5 changes its place for the resistance R5, and to grow their values until 33 nF and 15 kΩ; this change does not affect to the theoretical behavior of the GIC [27], but the maximum voltage drop is only 3 V in the worst case. On the other hand, our design has higher voltages than the voltages used in the original paper; this is due to two reasons: the first reason is that the change in the resistance range of the sensor increases the voltage needed; and the second reason is that in [21] a microcontroller PSoC was used simulating a timer 555, with power voltage level of 3.3 V, whereas in our design a 555 timer integrated circuit [26] is used with a minimum power voltage of 5 V.…”
Section: Converter Resistance-to-frequencymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations