2010
DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32833d01dd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new-generation N/L-type calcium channel blocker leads to less activation of the renin–angiotensin system compared with conventional L type calcium channel blocker

Abstract: It is suggested that cilnidipine leads to less activation of the RAS compared with amlodipine for the first time in human clinical patients and therefore cilnidipine might be expected to be superior in organ protection in addition to the antialbuminuric effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that cilnidipine suppresses RAS hyperactivity through its sympatholytic action (12). When compared with amlodipine, cilnidipine leads to weaker activation of the RAS in human patients (14), and the renotropic action of cilnidipine has been implicated in the reduction of RAS activity (13), suggesting that reduction of renal fibrosis, EMT, and macrophage infiltration by cilnidipine is via suppression of RAS activity in UUO kidneys. However, this is unlikely, as we could not find significant differences in expression levels of angiotensinconverting enzyme, angiotensinogen, and renin among the untreated, cilnidipine-treated, and amlodipine-treated UUO kidneys (unpublished observation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that cilnidipine suppresses RAS hyperactivity through its sympatholytic action (12). When compared with amlodipine, cilnidipine leads to weaker activation of the RAS in human patients (14), and the renotropic action of cilnidipine has been implicated in the reduction of RAS activity (13), suggesting that reduction of renal fibrosis, EMT, and macrophage infiltration by cilnidipine is via suppression of RAS activity in UUO kidneys. However, this is unlikely, as we could not find significant differences in expression levels of angiotensinconverting enzyme, angiotensinogen, and renin among the untreated, cilnidipine-treated, and amlodipine-treated UUO kidneys (unpublished observation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon of less activation of the RAS by cilnidipine compared to amlodipine was already shown in animals and human subjects [30][31][32] explained by N-type calcium channel's regulation of norepinephrine release [33] and N-type calcium channel suppression and reduction of norepinephrine secretion rate by cilnidipine [34,35]. On the other hand, PAC at cilnidipine and efonidipine was significantly lower than that at amlodipine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Whereas cilnidipine is as efficacious as amlodipine, the former clearly offers some advantages-lack of SNS activation, fewer adverse effects, and less ankle edema. [15][16][17] These clinical effects are likely to improve patient compliance and tolerability. Unlike other DHP CCBs, cilnidipine reduces proteinuria in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease (CKD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%