1996
DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Generation of the IMAGIC Image Processing System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
928
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,170 publications
(940 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
928
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 14,918 particles were manually selected using XMIPP v3.0 (Scheres et al , 2008) and extracted from aligned, averaged and CTF corrected frames with a box size of 400 pixels. All subsequent operations were done using IMAGIC‐5 (van Heel et al , 1996). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 14,918 particles were manually selected using XMIPP v3.0 (Scheres et al , 2008) and extracted from aligned, averaged and CTF corrected frames with a box size of 400 pixels. All subsequent operations were done using IMAGIC‐5 (van Heel et al , 1996). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 80 particles, representing complexes with and without a clear extra density corresponding to antibody, were manually picked from aligned, averaged and CTF corrected frames with a box size of 320 pixels. All subsequent operations were done using IMAGIC‐5 (van Heel et al , 1996). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMAN (Ludtke et al 1999;Tang et al 2007) and Frealign (Grigorieff, 1998(Grigorieff, , 2007 were the first single particle computational approaches that explicitly included CTF correction at the heart of their operation, which is absolutely required to reach high resolution. The full range of point group symmetries was also embedded in both programs, a feature that had also been available in Imagic since the mid-1980s (van Heel et al 1996).…”
Section: Improved Computer Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the mathematical operations to be carried out in the computer are alignment, determination of particle orientation (by random conical technique, common lines or reference to an existing density map), classification, reconstruction and correction of the contrast transfer function (CTF). It was earlier recognized that this kind of multistep processing, often with branching data flow, requires flexible, modular image processing software (SPIDER 3,4 , IMAGIC 5,6 , EMAN 7 and XMIPP 8 ; for a comprehensive overview, see the image processing software issue of the Journal of Structural Biology 9 ). Flexibility is desirable because of the need to explore different image processing and reconstruction strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%