2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2002.1193490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new generation of ultrasonic in-line inspection tools for detecting, sizing and locating metal loss and cracks in transmission pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the results showed great improvement when compared to the work of Reber [6], which detected the pits of at least 10 in diameter, or 20 when is desired the measure the pit depth, and also the work of Okamoto [7], which detected pits of 10 diameter with 1 depth, against the pits of 3 in diameter detected in this work. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the results achieved by the author in earlier studies [8] using a threshold detection, or even the peak detection, showed larger errors in the detection of the first wall, where neither visually was possible to see a good correlation between the results of the ultrasonic inspection and the tridimensional measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Yet the results showed great improvement when compared to the work of Reber [6], which detected the pits of at least 10 in diameter, or 20 when is desired the measure the pit depth, and also the work of Okamoto [7], which detected pits of 10 diameter with 1 depth, against the pits of 3 in diameter detected in this work. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the results achieved by the author in earlier studies [8] using a threshold detection, or even the peak detection, showed larger errors in the detection of the first wall, where neither visually was possible to see a good correlation between the results of the ultrasonic inspection and the tridimensional measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…As conventional MFL (Magnetic Flux Leakage) is universally used in the industry and qualitatively known to be sensitive to volumetric metal loss [4][5][6], ultrasonic crack detection is a superior method for cracks and crack-like defects, because it is more sensitive to defect edges that are close to each other [7][8][9][10]. The objective of this test was to evaluate and quantify the performance for UltraScan The electronics vehicle contains the ultrasound instrumentation units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of some practical limitation, such techniques are not efficient for detecting micro cracks in welded parts. Reber et al [ 8 ] have shown an ultrasonic configuration for crack detection in carbon steel pipeline girth welds, and presented relevant experimental results demonstrating the technique capability. Nevertheless, the authors highlighted, in their conclusions, that the application of such a technique in in-line inspection tools is still a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%