2022
DOI: 10.1080/03115518.2022.2048267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new genus and species of ?parthenogenic anostracan (Pancrustacea, Branchiopoda, ?Thamnocephalidae) from the Lower Cretaceous Koonwarra Fossil Bed in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphological architecture of Anostraca species is conservative, with a usual body length ranging from 6 to 25 mm, having 20 body segments, lacking a carapace, and bearing 11–19 pairs of leaf-like phyllopodia and stalked compound eyes [ 5 ]. Their fossil record dates back to at least the lower Cretaceous [ 6 , 7 ]. Anostraca are traditionally classified into two suborders: Artemiina (brine shrimp) and Anostricina (fairy shrimp) [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological architecture of Anostraca species is conservative, with a usual body length ranging from 6 to 25 mm, having 20 body segments, lacking a carapace, and bearing 11–19 pairs of leaf-like phyllopodia and stalked compound eyes [ 5 ]. Their fossil record dates back to at least the lower Cretaceous [ 6 , 7 ]. Anostraca are traditionally classified into two suborders: Artemiina (brine shrimp) and Anostricina (fairy shrimp) [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rolfe [ 4 ] proposed an alternative interpretation as a possible juvenile of the arthropleurid myriapod Bundenbachiellus minor Broili, 1930, a suggestion that has not been followed up by later work on Bundenbachiellus . The most recent works on fossil anostracans do not recognize Gilsonicaris as an anostracan, because it does not possess any anostracan synapomorphies beyond a possibly homonymous trunk [ 5 , 6 ]. It has even been postulated that it is perhaps not even an arthropod but part of an asteroid echinoderm arm (see [ 5 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%