“…However, our specimens differ from the representative records of M. littorale (Poppe, 1881;Scott, 1892;Gurney, 1932;Borutsky, 1952;Tai and Song, 1979;Huys et al, 1996) by the following: (1) the maxillipedal syn coxa is armed with six groups of spinules and one group of long setules, while it is ornamented with only two rows of spinules in the records of Poppe (1881) and Gurney (1932); (2) the maxillipedal endopod has one long and one very small accessory setae, whereas it is armed with only one long seta in the materials of previous records; (3) both anter ior and posterior surfaces of the swimming legs are armed with several rows of setules or spinules, while these orna mentations are absent or simple in previous records; (4) the distal inner setae on enp3 of the swimming legs are distally serrate, whereas it is plumose in previous records; (5) the inner apical seta of P2 enp3 in males is slightly swollen at its proximal, while it is not expanded in the records of Gurney (1932) or Huys et al (1996). These morphological details hitherto have not been considered as key characters to identify Microarthridion species, although detailed fea tures such as body ornamentation pattern, pores and sensilla pattern, and the feature of the setae on swimming legs have been noticed as characteristic features in modern harpacti coid taxonomy (Huy et al, 2005;Kihara and Huys, 2009;Karanovic and Cho, 2012;Fiers and Kotwicki, 2013).…”