2019
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4550.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new genus of hawker dragonfly (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae) from the Early Eocene Fur Formation of Denmark

Abstract: A new genus and species of fossil hawker dragonfly, Parabaissaeshna ejerslevense gen. et sp. nov. (Aeshninae: Allopetaliini), is described from the Early Eocene Fur Formation (Mo-clay) of the island of Mors, northern Denmark. Its position among traditional "gomphaeschnine" dragonflies is discussed, and it is attributed to the tribe Allopetaliini as close relative to the Cretaceous genus Baissaeshna, documenting the survival of this lineage through the K-Pg mass extinction. The Recent genus Boyeria and the Eoce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 486 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has made considerable progress with respect to insect fossilization processes (e.g., [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]). However, although previous work on insects from the Stolleklint Clay and Fur Formation has touched upon taphonomic and biostratinomic processes [20][21][22][23], most studies have focused on other aspects of the assemblage (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]). Moreover, in-depth chemical and ultrastructural analyses that can provide valuable information on fossil preservation patterns have so far been conducted almost exclusively on vertebrate remains [29][30][31][32][33][34], while insects, despite their great abundance, merely have been the subject of a single investigation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has made considerable progress with respect to insect fossilization processes (e.g., [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]). However, although previous work on insects from the Stolleklint Clay and Fur Formation has touched upon taphonomic and biostratinomic processes [20][21][22][23], most studies have focused on other aspects of the assemblage (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]). Moreover, in-depth chemical and ultrastructural analyses that can provide valuable information on fossil preservation patterns have so far been conducted almost exclusively on vertebrate remains [29][30][31][32][33][34], while insects, despite their great abundance, merely have been the subject of a single investigation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bechly et al (2001) . Nel and Fleck (2014) assigned the Priabonian Anglogomphaeschna to it, but the genus was later transferred to the Aeshninae by Bechly and Rasmussen (2019), despite the presence of a cordulegastrid gap, which they note is weakly developed in this genus.…”
Section: Idemlinea Archibald and Cannings New Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) supratriangle with crossveins; Garrison et al (2006), Cretaceous Baissaeshna species from Bechly et al (2001), and the Eocene Parabaissaeshna ejerslevense from Bechly and Rasmussen (2019). IR1 originating on RP1 in P. ejerslevense is rendered red, see text.…”
Section: Antiquiala Archibald and Cannings New Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fossil assemblage comprises: (1) more than 110 species of diatoms and other siliceous algae (Homann, 1991); (2) terrestrial plants, including seeds, fruiting structures of angiosperms and gymnosperms, tree trunks and twigs (especially Sequoia ), leaves, and a diverse microflora consisting of 42 types of spores and more than 100 types of pollen (Willumsen, 2004; Pedersen et al, 2012); (3) the earliest known Eocene insect fauna with more than 25,000 cataloged specimens belonging to more than 200 species from 15 orders, in many cases representing the earliest known lineages of several families (e.g., Larsson, 1975; Willmann, 1990, 1993; Ansorge, 1992; Rust, 1998; Archibald & Makarkin, 2006; Bechly & Rasmussen, 2019; Simonsen et al, 2022); (4) marine invertebrates, e.g., bivalves, gastropods, ophiuroids, and asteroids (Pedersen et al, 2012; Rasmussen, 1972); (5) specimens of Palaeophis Owen, 1841 also documenting a rare case of an articulated marine snake skeleton (Pedersen et al, 2012; Kristensen et al, 2012); (6) marine and freshwater turtle remains, including an almost complete specimen of Eosphargis Lydekker, 1889 and arguably the world's best preserved fossil chelonid, Tasbacka danica Karl & Madsen, 2012 (Nielsen, 1960; Karl & Lindow, 2010; Karl & Madsen, 2012; Lindgren et al, 2017; Garza et al, 2021); and (7) landbirds, including the earliest forms of stem-group parrots, ibises, trogons, turacos, and rollers (Kristoffersen, 2002; Waterhouse et al, 2008; Bertelli et al, 2010; Mayr & Bertelli, 2011; Bourdon et al, 2016). The fossil bird remains comprise imprints in the diatomite, isolated bones, feathers with preserved melanosomes, and complete articulated skeletons, counting Eocypselus vincenti Harrison, 1984, which is one of the best preserved bird fossils in the record and the earliest representative of the swifts (Dyke et al, 2004; Lindow & Dyke, 2007; Waterhouse et al, 2008; Bertelli et al, 2010; Mayr, 2010; gren et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%