Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 2006
DOI: 10.1201/noe0415415866.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new geotechnical centrifuge at the University of Nottingham, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit of the onboard arrangement is that it eliminates the need to transmit the analogue data signals through the centrifuge slip rings, which can lead to unwanted noise and losses. This arrangement is typical for a geotechnical centrifuge data acquisition system, being similar to others described by Ellis et al (2006) and Ma et al (2006).…”
Section: Conventional Geotechnical Centrifuge Data Acquisition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The benefit of the onboard arrangement is that it eliminates the need to transmit the analogue data signals through the centrifuge slip rings, which can lead to unwanted noise and losses. This arrangement is typical for a geotechnical centrifuge data acquisition system, being similar to others described by Ellis et al (2006) and Ma et al (2006).…”
Section: Conventional Geotechnical Centrifuge Data Acquisition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…To bridge this knowledge gap, we conducted experiments using the same collapse configuration system as in the aforementioned studies, in order to provide empirical data to compare against the numerical model presented in this work (see § 3 and § 4). The collapse of the granular column was initiated using a modified classical weighted-pulley system, designed for hands-free operation within the University of Nottingham's GT50/1.7 geotechnical beam centrifuge (see Ellis et al [29] for details). The evolution of the collapses were recorded using two high speed cameras and image processing was used to extract the location of both phase fronts throughout the duration of the experiment (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Fluid-saturated Granular Column Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%