2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12081257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New GPU Implementation of Support Vector Machines for Fast Hyperspectral Image Classification

Abstract: The storage and processing of remotely sensed hyperspectral images (HSIs) is facing important challenges due to the computational requirements involved in the analysis of these images, characterized by continuous and narrow spectral channels. Although HSIs offer many opportunities for accurately modeling and mapping the surface of the Earth in a wide range of applications, they comprise massive data cubes. These huge amounts of data impose important requirements from the storage and processing points of view. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, these classifiers can be successfully used to select and rank those variables with the greatest ability to discriminate between the target classes [ 82 , 84 , 85 ]. This is an important asset given that the high dimensionality of remotely sensed data makes the selection of the most relevant variables a time-consuming, error-prone, and subjective task [ 82 , 84 , 86 , 87 ]. SVM is particularly appealing in remote sensing due to its ability to successfully handle the high dimensionality of remotely sensed data [ 78 , 88 ], often producing higher classification accuracy than the traditional methods [ 89 , 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these classifiers can be successfully used to select and rank those variables with the greatest ability to discriminate between the target classes [ 82 , 84 , 85 ]. This is an important asset given that the high dimensionality of remotely sensed data makes the selection of the most relevant variables a time-consuming, error-prone, and subjective task [ 82 , 84 , 86 , 87 ]. SVM is particularly appealing in remote sensing due to its ability to successfully handle the high dimensionality of remotely sensed data [ 78 , 88 ], often producing higher classification accuracy than the traditional methods [ 89 , 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, HSI information has been exploited in machine learning (ML) by pixel-wise methods which consider HSI data as a list of spectral vectors, assuming that each pixel is pure and typically labeled as a single land cover type [32]- [34]. In the current literature, there are abundant pixelwise methods, such as the popular support vector machines (SVMs) [35], [36], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [37], [38], multinomial logistic regression (MLR) [39], [40], random forests (RFs) [41], [42] and standard artificial neural networks (ANNs) [43], among others. As these methods conduct only spectral processing to assign each pixel to its corresponding land-cover class, their reliability (in terms of classification accuracy) is strongly related to the number and spectral-quality of training samples.…”
Section: A Traditional Machine Learning Methods For Spectral-spatialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powerful in self-adaptive capability, machine-learning methods are popularly applied in land-use classification. Random Forests, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks have made a great contribution to land-cover/land-use classification [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The support vector machine (SVM) is applied to reduce the execution time of storing and processing hyperspectral images [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Forests, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks have made a great contribution to land-cover/land-use classification [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The support vector machine (SVM) is applied to reduce the execution time of storing and processing hyperspectral images [11]. Simple/multiple linear regression, random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR) were used to estimate canopy nitrogen weight of maize leaves, and the results showed that both machine learning models performed much better than linear regression [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%