2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new graphical coding of DNA sequence and its similarity calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the comparison, Table 4 shows the similarity/dissimilarity between Human and other species in some other methods similarly taking the Euclidean distance as the measurement. From Table 4 , finding that most listed methods 1 , 2 , 10 , 46 , 47 also make the same conclusion that Gorilla are the most similar species to Human and Chimp is the next similar species to Human except method 33 which make the similar conclusion that Chimp is the most similar species to Human and Gorilla is the next similar species to Human. Besides, some listed methods 2 , 10 , 47 also make the same conclusion that Gallus is the most dissimilar species to Human.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the comparison, Table 4 shows the similarity/dissimilarity between Human and other species in some other methods similarly taking the Euclidean distance as the measurement. From Table 4 , finding that most listed methods 1 , 2 , 10 , 46 , 47 also make the same conclusion that Gorilla are the most similar species to Human and Chimp is the next similar species to Human except method 33 which make the similar conclusion that Chimp is the most similar species to Human and Gorilla is the next similar species to Human. Besides, some listed methods 2 , 10 , 47 also make the same conclusion that Gallus is the most dissimilar species to Human.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…2 . As seen, the similar cluster pairs are respectively as Human-Gorilla(same cluster result in 1 , 2 , 10 , 40 , 47 , 48 ), Rat-Mouse(same result in 10 , 49 ), Lemur-Rabbit(same cluster result in 10 ), Goat-Bovine(same cluster result in 10 , 33 , 40 , 47 49 ), Human-Gorilla-Chimpanzee (same cluster result in 1 , 10 , 33 , 40 , 46 , 48 , 49 ).
Figure 2 Cluster dendrogram.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But these representational curves may degenerate, or may be not one-to-one mapping from DNA sequences. In order to overcome these defects, many new curves were introduced [11]- [19], while some new cluster methods were considered [20] [21] [22]. Some other representations were applied to the protein sequences [23] [24] [25] [26].…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Mathematics and Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these biological sequences do not increase our understanding of biology, so methods for analyzing these data are increasingly critical as the volume of biological sequence data increases. Sequence comparisons are fundamental operations in bioinformatics and many approaches have been proposed for comparing biological sequences, which can be categorized into two classes: alignment-based methods, where dynamic programming is used to evaluate all possible alignments and select the optimal solution with the highest score [1,2], and alignment-free methods, which measure the similarity between two biological sequences using statistical methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Some alignment-free methods deliver satisfactory performance [3][4][5][6][7][8], but they are still in the early stages of their development compared with alignmentbased methods [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%