2013
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2012.672080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Graphical Tool for Copula Selection

Abstract: The selection of copulas is an important aspect of dependence modeling. In many practical applications, only a limited number of copulas is tested, and the modeling applications usually are restricted to the bivariate case. One explanation is the fact that no graphical copula tool exist which allows to assess the goodness-of-fit of a large set of (possible higher dimensional) copula functions at once. This paper pursues to overcome this problem by developing a new graphical tool for the copula selection, based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when sample size is small, it is natural to focus on the simplest models, given the likely lack of statistical power to detect more complex model features. We note that bivariate copulas can be used to hierarchically build complex multivariate dependence structures (Aas et al, 2009); for a selection tool projecting multivariate copulas to two dimensions see Michiels and De Schepper (2013). In the case where datasets are richer, the problem the modeller faces is not so much one of selecting between different models, but more one of designing a model that is flexible enough to reflect idiosyncratic features of the data, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when sample size is small, it is natural to focus on the simplest models, given the likely lack of statistical power to detect more complex model features. We note that bivariate copulas can be used to hierarchically build complex multivariate dependence structures (Aas et al, 2009); for a selection tool projecting multivariate copulas to two dimensions see Michiels and De Schepper (2013). In the case where datasets are richer, the problem the modeller faces is not so much one of selecting between different models, but more one of designing a model that is flexible enough to reflect idiosyncratic features of the data, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2009 ), or Fermanian ( 2013 ). Other more specific avenues consist in applying graphical tools (Michiels and Schepper 2013 ) or information based criteria (Grønneberg and Hjort 2014 ). In fully parametric models, as considered in this paper, the latter can be formulated in terms of functions of the Fisher information matrix, which will allow us to generate optimal designs for copula model discrimination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that purpose a rather general approach is to use omnibus goodness-of-fit tests that require minimum assumptions, for recent reviews see, e.g., [2], [19], or [15]. Other more specific avenues consist in applying graphical tools ( [27]) or information based criteria ( [20]). In fully parametric models, as considered in this paper, the latter can be formulated in terms of functions of the Fisher information matrices, which will allow us to generate optimal designs for copula model discrimination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%