2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new high-resolution 3-D quantitative method for identifying bone surface modifications with implications for the Early Stone Age archaeological record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pante et al 2017), although the technique still needs developing properly before being useful for interpreting bone surface modifications of fossils. Pante et al 2017), although the technique still needs developing properly before being useful for interpreting bone surface modifications of fossils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pante et al 2017), although the technique still needs developing properly before being useful for interpreting bone surface modifications of fossils. Pante et al 2017), although the technique still needs developing properly before being useful for interpreting bone surface modifications of fossils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pante et al 2017), although the technique still needs developing properly before being useful for interpreting bone surface modifications of fossils. As Pante et al (2017) acknowledge 'the measurements recorded by the three analysts were not identical' because 'differences in the position and orientation of the mark relative to the optical pen resulted in small variations in the data captured'. Even if it is assumed that these derived mark sections are as close to the real mark sections as confocal microscopy can get, the resulting sections obtained are highly dependent on the protocol used for scanning each mark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Pante et al . () qualified the M‐PG method as more inaccurate and prone to error, this prejudiced statement was not supported by any data. Here we show that M‐PG meets the standards of more costly and technologically more sophisticated techniques, such as the use of LSCM, and M‐PG may even exceed the quality of the results obtained via 3D DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Some authors especially highlight the potential of high‐resolution 3D studies for the identification of different taphonomic processes (Pante et al. , ). Using a confocal profilometry, Pante et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation