2016
DOI: 10.33588/fem.196.860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new holistic way of assessment: programmatic assessment

Abstract: Programmatic assessment is a holistic view on assessment since it considers the full assessment program as a focus. Deliberate choices are being made on methods of assessment, their arrangement in time and purpose. Each moment of assessment is considered to be one single data point. Any decision on a single data point is fl awed and therefore pass/fail decisions are not being made. A single data point will only give quantitative or qualitative feedback relevant for learning. The follow-up of feedback, e.g. in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is particularly noteworthy with respect to a major problem of WPBA, namely, that residents only ask for assessments when they have performed well, as they are aiming for higher ratings, instead of being assessed on an average performance and seeing it as a learning opportunity. 14,30,40 Referring to van der Vleuten’s metaphor for programmatic assessment as a pixelated picture, 41,42 feedback on average performances could help to build a clearer and more comprehensive picture of the trainee’s competence, whereas exceptional performances only help to define the edges of the picture. Furthermore, more feedback given on average performances could even help deliver the promise of programmatic assessment by assembling a holistic picture of competence for robust summative decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is particularly noteworthy with respect to a major problem of WPBA, namely, that residents only ask for assessments when they have performed well, as they are aiming for higher ratings, instead of being assessed on an average performance and seeing it as a learning opportunity. 14,30,40 Referring to van der Vleuten’s metaphor for programmatic assessment as a pixelated picture, 41,42 feedback on average performances could help to build a clearer and more comprehensive picture of the trainee’s competence, whereas exceptional performances only help to define the edges of the picture. Furthermore, more feedback given on average performances could even help deliver the promise of programmatic assessment by assembling a holistic picture of competence for robust summative decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%