2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method for Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction and De Novo Drug Design

Abstract: Accurately predicting ligand binding affinity in a virtual screening campaign is still challenging. Here, we developed hybrid neural network (HNN) machine deep learning methods, HNN-denovo and HNN-affinity, by combining the 3D-CNN (convolutional neural network) and the FFNN (fast forward neural network) hybrid neural network framework. The HNN-denovo uses protein pocket structure and protein–ligand interactions as input features. The HNN-affinity uses protein sequences and ligand features as input features. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Limbu et al. developed a hybrid neural network–affinity model based on only ligand SMILES strings and protein sequences as input features [ 66 ]. In addition to the ligand SMILES strings and protein sequences, the interaction-free models, such as DeepDTAF [ 64 ], DEELIG [ 69 ], PLA-MoRe [ 65 ], PLANET [ 67 ] and CAPLA [ 81 ], also take the pocket sequence, the predicted secondary structure, atomic and residual physicochemical properties of protein/pocket, as well as the bioactive properties of the ligand as inputs.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Limbu et al. developed a hybrid neural network–affinity model based on only ligand SMILES strings and protein sequences as input features [ 66 ]. In addition to the ligand SMILES strings and protein sequences, the interaction-free models, such as DeepDTAF [ 64 ], DEELIG [ 69 ], PLA-MoRe [ 65 ], PLANET [ 67 ] and CAPLA [ 81 ], also take the pocket sequence, the predicted secondary structure, atomic and residual physicochemical properties of protein/pocket, as well as the bioactive properties of the ligand as inputs.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vector was created for the SMILES of each compound by converting each character in the SMILES string to its corresponding index in the dictionary. The resulting vector for the SMILES was padded with zeros or truncated so that it was of uniform length, L. We previously described in detail the SMILES preprocessing of chemicals [ 76 , 77 , 78 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized the hybrid neural network (HNN) framework [ 76 , 77 , 78 ], which we developed for single chemical toxicity and carcinogen prediction. In contrast to the original model’s one-hot encoding of SMILES, here, we vectorized the SMILES using the method described in the SMILES preprocessing section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last step, these descriptors were given as input features for the FFNN and CNN of the HNN hybrid framework, and simulations were initiated. The output of the CNN, and FFNN are merged, within the HNN framework [45][46][47][48] to create mixture classification models which are described below. Eventually, we predicted the unknown chemical mixture toxicity in a dosedependent manner with the inclusion of chemical interaction effect.…”
Section: Descriptor Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the qualitative and quantitative data assessing the mixtures and subsequent adverse effects are lacking, making the translation of existing data into meaningful prevention and therapeutic strategies [7,. We recently described a AI hybrid neural network (AI-HNN) machine learning method for predicting the binary, multiclass and categorical carcinogenicity of chemicals and their mixtures in a dose-dependent manner [45][46][47][48]. However, this method does not account for post-exposure effects such as toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties, among other toxicological and pathophysiological characteristics, that limits the utility of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%