2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-019-00932-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new hybrid simulated annealing-based genetic programming technique to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e investigations explored that the ANFIS model yielded superior accuracy compared with other machine learning techniques and experimental data points. However, the ANFIS model suffers from a number of limitations; for instance, it is weak in finding the optimal firing strength [86,87]. By using several metaheuristic optimization techniques such as genetic algorithm or simulated annealing as examples in [88,89], it is possible to search for and better determine the firing strengths of parameters.…”
Section: Machine Learning Method: Adaptive Neurofuzzy Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…e investigations explored that the ANFIS model yielded superior accuracy compared with other machine learning techniques and experimental data points. However, the ANFIS model suffers from a number of limitations; for instance, it is weak in finding the optimal firing strength [86,87]. By using several metaheuristic optimization techniques such as genetic algorithm or simulated annealing as examples in [88,89], it is possible to search for and better determine the firing strengths of parameters.…”
Section: Machine Learning Method: Adaptive Neurofuzzy Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the training dataset, the RF obtained the highest rank (25) while the SVM obtained the lowest rank (5). For the testing dataset, the ANN achieved the highest rank (22) while the CHAID achieved the lowest rank (6). Turning to the performance indices, the RF outperformed other models developed for the training dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Developed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is worth mentioning that if the model is a perfect fit for the data, then the R is 1, and MSE and MAE are 0. Thus, the R-value of much less than one and a higher MSE and MAE indicate a poorer prediction (Yong et al, 2020).…”
Section: Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%