1959
DOI: 10.1021/ja01521a070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Hypotensive Steroid Alkaloid From Conopharyngia Pachysiphon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…pachysiphon Stapf), and deduced as 20α-amino-3,5-pregnadiene ( 158 ) and 20α-amino-3β-hydroxy-5-pregnene-β-D-glucoside ( 159 ). 136…”
Section: Distribution Of Steroidal Alkaloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…pachysiphon Stapf), and deduced as 20α-amino-3,5-pregnadiene ( 158 ) and 20α-amino-3β-hydroxy-5-pregnene-β-D-glucoside ( 159 ). 136…”
Section: Distribution Of Steroidal Alkaloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two pregnane-type steroidal alkaloids were isolated from the roots of Conopharyngia pachysiphon (synonym: T. pachysiphon Stapf), and deduced as 20αamino-3,5-pregnadiene (158) and 20α-amino-3β-hydroxy-5pregnene-β-D-glucoside (159). 136…”
Section: Tabernaemontana Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2) are structurally steroid alkaloids. The hypotensive principle of Conopharyngia pachysiphon was elucidated as being 20-amino-3-f3-hydroxy-5-pregnene-f3-D-glucoside (DICKEL et al 1959) and therefore also belongs to the steroid alkaloids.…”
Section: Steroid Alkaloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears to have little or no activity against the malaria parasite (Stephenson, 1948) or helminths (Janot and Cavier, 1949;Mackie and others, 1955) although it has been reported to show weak antituberculous properties (Lambin and Bernard, 1953;Meissner and Hesse, 1930). Its toxicity towards Entamoeba dysenteriae has led to a limited clinical use (see for example Acton and Chopra, 1933;Lavier, Crosnier and Merle, 1948;Tanguy, Robin and Raoult, 1948) particularly on the Indian subcontinent and there have been several studies (see for example Durieux, Trenous and Tanguy, 1948 ;Kaushiva, 1957;Muhlpfordt and Martinez-Silva, 1956 ;Piette, 1950) in which its efficacy has been compared to that of emetine. The results indicate that it is inferior to emetine as an amoebicide, but not such a potent emetic.…”
Section: VImentioning
confidence: 99%